Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22006091›Full record

ReviewNeurosurgical review2012

Current therapeutic options and novel molecular markers in skull base chordomas.

Filippo Gagliardi, Nicola Boari, Paola Riva, Pietro Mortini

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurosurgical review, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Image guided endonasal endoscopic approach to different clivus pathologies.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Filippo GagliardiDepartment of Neurosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy. gagliardi.filippo@hsr.it
Nicola Boari
Paola Riva
Pietro Mortini
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chordomas are extremely rare tumours. They arise in the spheno-occipital region in 35% of cases. Chordomas usually present benign histopathological features but often exhibit a malignant clinical behaviour. Radical surgical removal and high-dose radiation therapy seem to be effective in tumour control and to improve survival rate. Despite the advancements in microsurgical techniques and the development of radiation therapies, clival chordomas still represent a challenge. Nevertheless it appears that chordomas that have been resected to the same extent and that received post-operative radiotherapy might exhibit different rates of regrowth. This result supports the hypothesis that the recurrence rate of chordomas might be dependent on biological variables other than the extent of resection and the post-operative radiotherapy. Genetic and molecular studies on oncogenesis of chordomas are still limited, but they represent the basis for the development of molecular targeted therapies. We present a review of the current knowledge about skull base chordomas biology, therapeutic options and related clinical outcome.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorChemotherapy, AdjuvantChordomaFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRadiotherapy, AdjuvantSkull Base NeoplasmsSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID22006091
OpenAlexW1971972970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.