Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22006023›Full record

Trial reportInternational urogynecology journal2011

Time-to-effect with darifenacin in overactive bladder: a pooled analysis.

Vik Khullar, Jenelle Foote, Yodit Seifu, Mathias Egermark

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International urogynecology journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Effectiveness of Anticholinergic Therapy for Overactive Bladders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2016
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Vik KhullarUrogynaecology Department, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK. vik.khullar@imperial.ac.uk
Jenelle Foote
Yodit Seifu
Mathias Egermark
Novartis (United States) · USRoche (Sweden) · SESt Mary's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThis study was conducted to assess time-to-effect with darifenacin in patients with overactive bladder (OAB).

methodsEfficacy and safety data were pooled from 1,059 patients (19-88 years, 85% women) randomized to darifenacin 7.5 or 15 mg once daily or matched placebo in three double-blind 12-week studies. Patients completed electronic bladder symptom diaries (number of micturitions/day; incontinence episodes/day; urgency episodes/day). A post hoc efficacy analysis was performed on the earliest recorded timepoints.

resultsThe full analysis population comprised 1,053 patients. Statistically significant improvements were observed in all OAB symptoms (except nocturnal awakenings) for both darifenacin doses versus placebo at week 2, with further improvements over 6 and 12 weeks. Both darifenacin doses significantly improved all OAB symptoms from as early as days 6-8 versus placebo.

conclusionsDarifenacin 7.5 and 15 mg significantly reduced OAB symptoms throughout the study. The rapid onset-of-effect is desirable to patients with OAB and useful for their clinical management.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBenzofuransDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMedical RecordsMiddle AgedMuscarinic AntagonistsPyrrolidinesRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsBenzofuransdarifenacinMuscarinic AntagonistsPyrrolidines

Identifiers

PMID22006023
OpenAlexW2076534259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.