Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22005893›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2012

Alternative methods for the assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony using phase analysis of gated single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging.

Wael AlJaroudi, Wael A Jaber, Richard A Grimm, Thomas Marwick, Manuel D Cerqueira

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mechanical dyssynchrony & CRT: Is it time for guideline updates?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  2. Are SPECT MPI measures of dyssynchrony dyssynchronous?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  3. Auxiliary ischemic markers, the role of left ventricular dyssynchrony.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The utility ofJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Article
  6. Making the invisible visible: Phase dyssynchrony has potential as a new prognostic marker.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. SPECT and PET in ischemic heart failure.Heart failure reviews · 2017
    Review
  9. Determinants of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in patients submitted to myocardial perfusion imaging: A cardiac CZT study.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cardiovascular imaging 2012 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2013
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wael AlJaroudiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Section of Imaging, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. aljarow@ccf.org
Wael A Jaber
Richard A Grimm
Thomas Marwick
Manuel D Cerqueira

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measurement of left ventricular (LV) mechanical dyssynchrony from single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) allows optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients. We compared the discriminatory ability and reproducibility of a new software method, Corridor 4DM (4DM) to the established method, Emory Cardiac Toolbox (ECTb) in normals and heart failure patients. LV dyssynchrony was measured in 100 control (Group 1) and 100 patients with LVEF <35% (Group 2) using time to peak thickening with first harmonic, fourth harmonic, and volume curve methods with the 4DM software, and compared to ECTb. Of the 3 4DM methods, first harmonic had the best correlation with the ECTb (R = 0.88, slope = 1.00, P < 0.0001, bias = -0.18° [95% CI: -20°; 16°] for phase standard deviation; and similarly for histogram bandwidth, while volume curve analysis had the greatest variation. The intra and inter-observer reproducibility for 4DM time to peak thickening with first harmonic was very good (R = 0.99, P < 0.0001 and coefficient of variability 10% [95% CI 9.2-12%] for intra-observer, and R = 0.97, P < 0.0001, coefficient of variability 16% [15-17%] for inter-observer, respectively). Finally, in patients with LVEF <35%, the area under the curve on receiver operator characteristic analysis was 0.93 [95% CI: 0.89-0.97] to detect significant mechanical dyssynchrony (i.e. standard deviation ≥43°) using 4DM versus ECTb. The 4DM-software provides an accurate and reproducible alternative method of dyssynchrony analysis of SPECT MPI for evaluation and management of heart failure.

Indexed as

SoftwareTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonAgedAlgorithmsArea Under CurveChi-Square DistributionFemaleHeart FailureHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial Perfusion ImagingObserver VariationPredictive Value of Tests

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.