ArticlePreventing chronic disease2011
Demographic and geographic differences in exposure to secondhand smoke in Missouri workplaces, 2007-2008.
Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Burden of Disease Due to Secondhand Smoke among Korean Adults at Sub-National Level.Journal of Korean medical science · 2018Article
- Passive Smoking Indicators in Italy: Does the Gross Domestic Product Matter?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
- Affecting Factors of Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Korea: Focused on Different Exposure Locations.Journal of Korean medical science · 2016Article
- Exposure to Hookah and Cigarette Smoke in Children and Adolescents According to Their Socio-Economic Status: The CASPIAN-IV Study.Iranian journal of pediatrics · 2016Article
- Individual and city-level determinants of secondhand smoke exposure in China.International journal of health geographics · 2015Article
- "It's just a way of fitting in:" Tobacco use and the lived experience of lesbian, gay, and bisexual appalachians.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2014Article
- Secondhand smoke exposure and smoking behavior among young adult bar patrons.American journal of public health · 2013Article
- Effect of personal characteristics on individual support for indoor smoke-free air laws, Indiana, 2008.Preventing chronic disease · 2012Article
- Study of secondhand smoke exposure in St. Louis City and County suggests need for comprehensive smoke-free Missouri law adoption.Missouri medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAfrican Americans, Hispanics, service and blue-collar workers, and residents of rural areas are among those facing higher rates of workplace secondhand smoke exposure in states without smokefree workplace laws. Consequently, these groups also experience more negative health effects resulting from secondhand smoke exposure. The objective of this study was to examine disparities in workplace secondhand smoke exposure in a state without a comprehensive statewide smokefree workplace law and to use this information in considering a statewide law.
methodsWe developed a logistic multilevel model by using data from a 2007-2008 county-level study to account for individual and county-level differences in workplace secondhand smoke exposure. We included sex, age, race, annual income, education level, smoking status, and rural or urban residence as predictors of workplace secondhand smoke exposure.
resultsFactors significantly associated with increased exposure to workplace secondhand smoke were male sex, lower education levels, lower income, living in a small rural or isolated area, and current smoking. For example, although the overall rate of workplace exposure in Missouri is 11.5%, our model predicts that among young white men with low incomes and limited education living in small rural areas, 40% of nonsmokers and 56% of smokers may be exposed to secondhand smoke at work.
conclusionSignificant disparities exist in workplace secondhand smoke exposure across Missouri. A statewide smokefree workplace law would protect all citizens from workplace secondhand smoke exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22005628PMC3221576What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.