Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22004327›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2012

An empirical Bayesian approach for identifying differential coexpression in high-throughput experiments.

John A Dawson, Christina Kendziorski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Network-based Transcriptome-wide Expression Study for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Crosstalk analysis of dysregulated pathways in preeclampsia.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Novel Method to Identify Differential Pathways in Hippocampus Alzheimer's Disease.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2017
    Article
  15. Benchmarking pathway interaction network for colorectal cancer to identify dysregulated pathways.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John A DawsonDepartment of Statistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.
Christina Kendziorski

Funding

Breast Cancer GWAS: Function and Environmental InteractionsR01ES017400 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GOULD, MICHAEL N, NEWTON, MICHAEL A · 2009 to 2013
$2.1M
Interdisciplinary Biostatistics Training ProgramT32GM074904 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI NEWTON, MICHAEL A · 2005 to 2012
$1.5M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES017400NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM074904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A common goal of microarray and related high-throughput genomic experiments is to identify genes that vary across biological condition. Most often this is accomplished by identifying genes with changes in mean expression level, so called differentially expressed (DE) genes, and a number of effective methods for identifying DE genes have been developed. Although useful, these approaches do not accommodate other types of differential regulation. An important example concerns differential coexpression (DC). Investigations of this class of genes are hampered by the large cardinality of the space to be interrogated as well as by influential outliers. As a result, existing DC approaches are often underpowered, exceedingly prone to false discoveries, and/or computationally intractable for even a moderately large number of pairs. To address this, an empirical Bayesian approach for identifying DC gene pairs is developed. The approach provides a false discovery rate controlled list of significant DC gene pairs without sacrificing power. It is applicable within a single study as well as across multiple studies. Computations are greatly facilitated by a modification to the expectation-maximization algorithm and a procedural heuristic. Simulations suggest that the proposed approach outperforms existing methods in far less computational time; and case study results suggest that the approach will likely prove to be a useful complement to current DE methods in high-throughput genomic studies.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremAlgorithmsBiometryComputer SimulationEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLikelihood FunctionsMaleModels, StatisticalMultivariate AnalysisOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisProstatic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID22004327
PMCPMC3482945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.