Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22004141›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2011

Growth restriction in gastroschisis: quantification of its severity and exploration of a placental cause.

Nathaniel R Payne, Susan C Simonton, Sam Olsen, Mark A Arnesen, Kathleen M Pfleghaar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Interval growth across gestation in pregnancies with fetal gastroschisis.American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Gastroschisis: A State-of-the-Art Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  10. Gastroschisis at school age: what do parents report?European journal of pediatrics · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Utility of third trimester sonographic measurements for predicting SGA in cases of fetal gastroschisis.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nathaniel R PayneDepartment of Epidemiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. rob.payne@childrensmn.org
Susan C Simonton
Sam Olsen
Mark A Arnesen
Kathleen M Pfleghaar
Abbott Northwestern Hospital · USChildren’s Minnesota - St. Paul Hospital · USMichigan State University · US

Funding

Training Program in Perinatal EpidemiologyT32HD046377 · NICHD · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PANETH, NIGEL SEFTON · 2005 to 2014
$2.5M
NICHD NIH HHS 5 T32 HD046377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastroschisis patients are commonly small for gestational age (SGA, birth weight [BW] < 10th centile). However, the extent, symmetry and causes of that growth restriction remain controversial.

methodsWe compared BW, crown-heel length (LT), occipitofrontal circumference (OFC) and ponderal index (PI) in 179 gastroschisis cases and 895 matched controls by univariate and multiple regression. Fetal ultrasounds (N = 80) were reviewed to determine onset of growth restriction. Placental histology was examined in 31 gastroschisis patients whose placental tissue was available and in 29 controls.

resultsGastroschisis cases weighed less than controls (BW = 2400 ± 502 g vs. 2750 ± 532 g, p < 0.001) and their BW frequency curve was shifted to the left, indicating lower BW as a group compared to controls (p < 0.001 by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test). BW differences varied from -148 g at 33 weeks to -616 g at 38 weeks gestation. Intrauterine growth restriction was symmetric with gastroschisis patients having a shorter LT (45.7 ± 3.3 vs. 48.4 ± 2.7 cm, p < 0.001), smaller OFC (31.9 ± 1.9 vs. 32.9 ± 1.6 cm, p < 0.001), but larger ponderal index (2.51 ± 0.37 vs. 2.40 ± 0.16, p < 0.001) compared to controls. Gastroschisis patients had a similar reduction in BW (-312 g, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -367, -258) compared to those with chromosomal abnormalities (-239 g, CI = -292, -187). Growth deficits appeared early in the second trimester and worsened as gestation increased. Placental chorangiosis was more common in gastroschisis patients than controls, even after removing all SGA patients (77% vs. 42%, p = 0.02).

conclusionsMarked, relatively symmetric intrauterine growth restriction is an intrinsic part of gastroschisis. It begins early in the second trimester, and is associated with placental chorangiosis.

Indexed as

Birth WeightBody HeightCase-Control StudiesCephalometryChorionic VilliFemaleFetal Growth RetardationGastroschisisHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeMalePlacenta DiseasesPregnancyRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID22004141
PMCPMC3214135
OpenAlexW2079912656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.