Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22003163›Full record

Trial reportPhysical therapy2011

Performance-based versus patient-reported physical function: what are the underlying predictors?

Jonathan F Bean, Daniele D Olveczky, Dan K Kiely, Sharon I LaRose, Alan M Jette

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Physical therapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Using a measurement type-independent metric to compare patterns of determinants between patient-reported versus performance-based physical function in hemodialysis patients.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Dynamic weight-bearing assessment of pain in knee osteoarthritis: a reliability and agreement study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2015
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Development and validation of the mobility in middle-age questionnaire.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Has Muscle Power Better Discriminative Capacity Compared to Muscle Strength in Predicting Worsening Disability in Older Adults?The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jonathan F BeanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, and Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, 1575 Cambridge St, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. jfbean@partners.org
Daniele D Olveczky
Dan K Kiely
Sharon I LaRose
Alan M Jette

Funding

TUFTS--FIELDINGP30AG031679 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SHALENDER BHASIN · 2008 to 2026
$23.9M
Ameliorating Disability through Power TrainingK23AG019663 · NIA · SPAULDING REHABILITATION HOSPITAL · PI BEAN, JONATHAN F · 2003 to 2006
$627k
NIA NIH HHS 5P30AG031679NIA NIH HHS K23 AG019663NIA NIH HHS K23AG019663-01A2NIA NIH HHS P30 AG031679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFunctional limitations have been operationally defined for studies of rehabilitation science through measures of physical performance and patient-reported function. Although conceived as representing similar concepts, differences between these 2 modes of measuring physical functioning have not been adequately characterized scientifically.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to compare the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) with the function component of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI) with respect to their association with physiologic factors and other psychosocial and health factors potentially influencing rehabilitative care.

designThis study was a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from a sample of community-dwelling older adults (N=137) with mobility limitations enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of exercise.

methodsA performance-based measure of function (the SPPB) and a self-report measure of function (the LLFDI) served as functional outcomes. Physiologic factors included measures of leg strength, leg velocity, and exercise tolerance test (ETT) duration, which served as a surrogate measure of aerobic capacity. Psychosocial and health factors included age, sex, height, body mass index, number of chronic conditions, depression, and falls efficacy.

resultsSeparate multivariable regression models predicting SPPB and LLFDI scores described 33% and 42% of the variance in each outcome (R(2)), respectively. Leg velocity and ETT duration were positively associated with both performance-based and patient-reported functional measures. Leg strength and age were positively associated with SPPB scores, whereas number of chronic conditions, sex, and falls efficacy were associated with the LLFDI scores. LIMITATIONS: This study included older adults with mobility limitations and may not generalize to other populations.

conclusionsPerformance-based and patient-reported measures of physical function appear to assess different aspects of an older person's functioning. The SPPB was associated with age and physiologic factors, whereas patient-reported function measured by the LLFDI was associated with these factors as well as with psychosocial and health factors.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationMobility LimitationSelf ReportTask Performance and AnalysisActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesExercise ToleranceFemaleHumansLegMaleMultivariate AnalysisMuscle Strength

Identifiers

PMID22003163
PMCPMC3229045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.