Trial reportJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2011
Model-based determination of abatacept exposure in support of the recommended dose for Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients.
Trial report in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Higher abatacept exposure after transplant decreases acute GVHD risk without increasing adverse events.Blood · 2023Trial
- Body mass index and clinical response to intravenous or subcutaneous abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Clinical rheumatology · 2017Trial
- Dose selection using a semi-mechanistic integrated glucose-insulin-glucagon model: designing phase 2 trials for a novel oral glucokinase activator.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2013Trial
- Model-Informed Abatacept Dose Recommendation in Pediatric Patients With Acute Graft Versus Host Disease.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Relationship of Intravenous and Subcutaneous Abatacept in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019Article
- Modeling pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of abatacept and disease progression in collagen-induced arthritic rats: a population approach.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2013Article
- Review
- Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling of monoclonal antibodies.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2013Review
- Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling in inflammation.Critical reviews in biomedical engineering · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to provide support for a body weight-tiered dosing regimen by characterizing abatacept pharmacokinetics (PK) and the relationship between exposure and the ACR20 (American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement) response in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A population PK model was developed using NONMEM with 2,535 samples from 344 Japanese RA patients in two clinical trials. The exposure-response relationship was characterized using a Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) logistic regression model, with time-varying actual trough concentrations and ACR20 responder rates over 6 months in a randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial for stable methotrexate. Abatacept exposure was well characterized using a linear, two-compartment model, in which body weight and the empirically calculated glomerular filtration rate were significant covariates for clearance. The ACR20 response model was developed by examining the quasi-likelihood information criterion, and the cumulative logit in the final model was specified by the log-transformed trough concentration. The predicted ACR20 responder rate was consistent with the actual values in the clinical trial and this model revealed trough concentrations higher than the recommended body weight-tiered dose are unlikely to result in substantial increases in clinical efficacy. Considering that ACR20 is a longitudinal binary variable and the response to RA treatment is delayed, the GEE model was useful for predicting the probability of an ACR20 response. In conclusion, the same dosing regimen as non-Japanese patients is recommended because a body weight-tiered dosing regimen achieves similar exposures across the wide range of body weight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22002809What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.