Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22002743›Full record

ReviewProtoplasma2012

Nanoscale and geometric influences on the microtubule cytoskeleton in plants: thinking inside and outside the box.

Chris Ambrose, Geoffrey O Wasteneys

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Protoplasma, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Organogenesis at the Shoot Apical Meristem.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Plasmolysis: Loss of Turgor and Beyond.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2014
    Article
  5. Microtubule networks for plant cell division.Systems and synthetic biology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chris AmbroseDepartment of Botany, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada. chrisamb@mail.ubc.ca
Geoffrey O Wasteneys
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-86675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dynamic microtubule (MT) cytoskeleton found in the cell cortex of plants drives cell expansion via cell wall modifications. In the last decade, live cell imaging studies employing green fluorescent protein have helped unravel the mechanisms behind how cells arrange cortical MTs into complex arrays and shape cell expansion. In this review, we explore the reverse scenario: how cell geometry and organelles influence and constrain the organization and behavior of cortical MTs. This newly emerging principle explains how cells perceive local nanoscale structural input from MT-organizing centers, such as the nucleus, endomembranes, and cell edges, and translate this into global cell-wide order via MT self-organization. Studies primarily using the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana and tobacco BY-2 suspension cultures have broadened our understanding of how cells form not only elegant parallel arrays but also more complex MT configurations, including the prominent MT bundles found in preprophase bands, leaf epidermal cells, and developing xylem.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisCells, CulturedCell WallGreen Fluorescent ProteinsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMicrotubulesNicotianaGreen Fluorescent ProteinsMicrotubule-Associated Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22002743
OpenAlexW1992470130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.