GuidelineInternational journal of clinical oncology2012
Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2010 for the treatment of colorectal cancer.
Guideline in International journal of clinical oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 380 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection After Neoadjuvant Chemo-radiation for Preoperative Enlarged Lateral Nodes in Advanced Low Rectal Cancer: a Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial
D2 Versus D3 Dissection in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy In Right Cancer Colon Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
380 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Risk assessment of lymph node metastasis and comparison of treatment modalities for low-risk T1b colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Pooled it
- Robotic versus laparoscopic pelvic lateral lymph node dissection in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Pooled it
- Additional staining for lymphovascular invasion is associated with increased estimation of lymph node metastasis in patients with T1 colorectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2024Pooled it
- Outcomes of metachronous para-aortic lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer: a systematic review of the literature.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Complete mesocolic excision versus standard resection for colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative safety and an evaluation of the use of a robotic approach.Techniques in coloproctology · 2023Pooled it
- Inferior mesenteric artery ligation level in rectal cancer surgery: still no answer-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Definition and reporting of lymphadenectomy and complete mesocolic excision for radical right colectomy: a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Pooled it
- Risk factors for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with lower rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Effect of radical lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Complete Mesocolic Excision and D3 Lymphadenectomy versus Conventional Colectomy for Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Prognosis of Patients With Colorectal Cancer and Apical Lymph Node Metastasis at the Inferior Mesenteric Artery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Estimation of invasion depth of early colorectal cancer using EUS and NBI-ME: a meta-analysis.Techniques in coloproctology · 2019Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of a needle-type knife that injects fluid through its tip compared with a conventional needle-injection knife for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial (with video).Surgical endoscopy · 2026Trial
- Multicenter phase II clinical study of the efficiency and safety of capecitabine plus intermittent oxaliplatin with bevacizumab as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (VOICE trial).International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Trial
- A new fat-dissociation method to detect lymph nodes in colorectal cancer: a prospective randomized study.Scientific reports · 2020Trial
- Intraoperative radiotherapy for resectable advanced lower rectal cancer-final results of a randomized controlled trial (UMIN000021353).Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Phase III randomised trial comparing 6 vs. 12-month of capecitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage III colon cancer: final results of the JFMC37-0801 study.British journal of cancer · 2019Trial
- Safety of mFOLFOX6/XELOX as adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection of stage III colon cancer: phase II clinical study (The FACOS study).International journal of colorectal disease · 2018Trial
- Phase III trial comparing UFT + PSK to UFT + LV in stage IIB, III colorectal cancer (MCSGO-CCTG).Surgery today · 2018Trial
320 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a major cause of death in Japan, where it accounts for the largest number of deaths from malignant neoplasms in women and the third largest number in men. Many new treatment methods have been developed over the last few decades. The Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2010 for the treatment of colorectal cancer (JSCCR Guidelines 2010) have been prepared to show standard treatment strategies for colorectal cancer, to eliminate disparities among institutions in terms of treatment, to eliminate unnecessary treatment and insufficient treatment, and to deepen mutual understanding between health-care professionals and patients by making these Guidelines available to the general public. These Guidelines have been prepared by consensuses reached by the JSCCR Guideline Committee, based on a careful review of the evidence retrieved by literature searches and in view of the medical health insurance system and actual clinical practice settings in Japan. Therefore, these Guidelines can be used as a tool for treating colorectal cancer in actual clinical practice settings. More specifically, they can be used as a guide to obtaining informed consent from patients and choosing the method of treatment for each patient. As a result of the discussions held by the Guideline Committee, controversial issues were selected as Clinical Questions, and recommendations were made. Each recommendation is accompanied by a classification of the evidence and a classification of recommendation categories based on the consensus reached by the Guideline Committee members. Here we present the English version of the JSCCR Guidelines 2010.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22002491What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.