Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22002477›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of hematology2011

The use of molecular-based risk stratification and pharmacogenomics for outcome prediction and personalized therapeutic management of multiple myeloma.

Sarah K Johnson, Christoph J Heuck, Anthony P Albino, Pingping Qu, Qing Zhang, Bart Barlogie, John D Shaughnessy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of hematology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bone marrow morphologic features, MyPRS, and gene mutation correlations in plasma cell myeloma.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2020
    Article
  5. Risk Stratification in Multiple Myeloma.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2016
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Current approaches for the treatment of multiple myeloma.International journal of hematology · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah K JohnsonDepartment of Pathology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Christoph J HeuckMyeloma Institute for Research and Therapy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham, Slot 776, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.
Anthony P AlbinoSignal Genetics LLC, 667 Madison Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Pingping QuCancer Research and Biostatistics, Seattle, WA, USA.
Qing ZhangMyeloma Institute for Research and Therapy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham, Slot 776, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.
Bart BarlogieMyeloma Institute for Research and Therapy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham, Slot 776, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.
John D ShaughnessyMyeloma Institute for Research and Therapy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham, Slot 776, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA. shaughnessyjohn@uams.edu.

Funding

Tumor Cell-Microenvironment Interactions in the Molecular Pathogenesis of MultiplP01CA055819 · NCI · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI BELLAMY, WILLIAM T · 1993 to 2013
$49.7M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA055819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite improvement in therapeutic efficacy, multiple myeloma (MM) remains incurable with a median survival of approximately 10 years. Gene-expression profiling (GEP) can be used to elucidate the molecular basis for resistance to chemotherapy through global assessment of molecular alterations that exist at diagnosis, after therapeutic treatment and that evolve during tumor progression. Unique GEP signatures associated with recurrent chromosomal translocations and ploidy changes have defined molecular classes with differing clinical features and outcomes. When compared to other stratification systems the GEP70 test remained a significant predictor of outcome, reduced the number of patients classified with a poor prognosis, and identified patients at increased risk of relapse despite their standard clinico-pathologic and genetic findings. GEP studies of serial samples showed that risk increases over time, with relapsed disease showing GEP shifts toward a signature of poor outcomes. GEP signatures of myeloma cells after therapy were prognostic for event-free and overall survival and thus may be used to identify novel strategies for overcoming drug resistance. This brief review will focus on the use of GEP of MM to define high-risk myeloma, and elucidate underlying mechanisms that are beginning to change clinical decision-making and inform drug design.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyMultiple MyelomaPrognosisRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID22002477
PMCPMC4433024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.