Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22001755›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2011

Probabilistic modeling of Hi-C contact maps eliminates systematic biases to characterize global chromosomal architecture.

Eitan Yaffe, Amos Tanay

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 369 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
369citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

369 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 642 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Read Mapping for Hi-C Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  18. Mapping the 3D genome architecture.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Review
  19. CWL-Based Analysis Pipeline for Hi-C Data: From FASTQ Files to Matrices.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

309 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eitan YaffeDepartment of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Amos Tanay
Weizmann Institute of Science · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hi-C experiments measure the probability of physical proximity between pairs of chromosomal loci on a genomic scale. We report on several systematic biases that substantially affect the Hi-C experimental procedure, including the distance between restriction sites, the GC content of trimmed ligation junctions and sequence uniqueness. To address these biases, we introduce an integrated probabilistic background model and develop algorithms to estimate its parameters and renormalize Hi-C data. Analysis of corrected human lymphoblast contact maps provides genome-wide evidence for interchromosomal aggregation of active chromatin marks, including DNase-hypersensitive sites and transcriptionally active foci. We observe extensive long-range (up to 400 kb) cis interactions at active promoters and derive asymmetric contact profiles next to transcription start sites and CTCF binding sites. Clusters of interacting chromosomal domains suggest physical separation of centromere-proximal and centromere-distal regions. These results provide a computational basis for the inference of chromosomal architectures from Hi-C experiments.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, HumanModels, GeneticProbabilityBinding SitesCluster AnalysisEpigenesis, GeneticHumansLymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID22001755
OpenAlexW2001576815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.