Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22001381›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2011

Shaking the myosin family tree: biochemical kinetics defines four types of myosin motor.

Marieke J Bloemink, Michael A Geeves

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Structure, regulation, and mechanisms of nonmuscle myosin-2.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Switch-2 determines MgFrontiers in physiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Unconventional Myosins fromBiomolecules · 2022
    Review
  10. Actomyosin Complex.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Evolution of mechanical cooperativity among myosin II motors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marieke J BloeminkSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NJ, UK.
Michael A Geeves

Funding

Wellcome Trust 085309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although all myosin motors follow the same basic cross-bridge cycle, they display a large variety in the rates of transition between different states in the cycle, allowing each myosin to be finely tuned for a specific task. Traditionally, myosins have been classified by sequence analysis into a large number of sub-families (∼35). Here we use a different method to classify the myosin family members which is based on biochemical and mechanical properties. The key properties that define the type of mechanical activity of the motor are duty ratio (defined as the fraction of the time myosin remains attached to actin during each cycle), thermodynamic coupling of actin and nucleotide binding to myosin and the degree of strain-sensitivity of the ADP release step. Based on these properties we propose to classify myosins into four different groups: (I) fast movers, (II) slow/efficient force holders, (III) strain sensors and (IV) gates.

Indexed as

Adenosine DiphosphateAdenosine TriphosphateHumansKineticsMyosinsThermodynamicsAdenosine DiphosphateAdenosine TriphosphateMyosins

Identifiers

PMID22001381
PMCPMC4500163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.