ArticleEuropean journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society2012
A structured approach to knowledge exchange: understanding the implementation of a cancer survivor program.
Article in European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and predictors of obesity-related cancers among racial/ethnic groups with metabolic syndrome.PloS one · 2021Article
- ¿Ahora qué?: Cultural Adaptation of a Cancer Survivorship Intervention for Latino/a Cancer Survivors.Psycho-oncology · 2019Article
- Assessment of the awareness and knowledge of cancer survivors regarding the components of metabolic syndrome.PloS one · 2018Article
- Using Telehealth to Train Providers of a Cancer Support Intervention.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2015Article
- The Knowledge Exchange-Decision Support Model: application to cancer navigation programs.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2014Article
- Evaluating a knowledge exchange intervention in cancer survivorship care: a workshop to foster implementation of Online Support Groups.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this research was to describe the application of a model of knowledge exchange, the Knowledge Exchange-Decision Support (KE-DS) Model, to the Canadian pilot of Cancer Transitions, a psychosocial program for cancer survivors.
methodWe compared and contrasted the program planning and implementation processes across three diverse sites offering Cancer Transitions. The KE-DS Model guided the collection and analysis of observations and written data according to specific model components.
resultsThe use of the KE-DS Model highlighted four pertinent factors that influenced knowledge exchange during planning and implementation processes of this psychosocial program. First, the geographic diversity of where these programs were offered affected strategies for program promotion, recruitment and means of access. Second, the variation of the professional and organizational capacity of the three sites was critical to program planning and delivery. Third, cultural values and norms shaped each site's approach. Fourth, the KE-DS Model identified populations who were included and excluded from participation.
conclusionsThe KE-DS Model was useful in elucidating the processes of knowledge exchange during the planning and implementing of an intervention for survivor care. This process information will inform future offerings of Cancer Transitions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.