ArticleStructure (London, England : 1993)2011
A new generation of crystallographic validation tools for the protein data bank.
Article in Structure (London, England : 1993), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 287 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
287 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The Advantages of AI for Computational Protein Studies and Looking Ahead at the Next Challenges: Single Structures Are Not Enough.Journal of molecular biology · 2026Review
- IHMValidation: Assessment of Integrative Structure Models Deposited to the Protein Data Bank.Journal of molecular biology · 2026Article
- Avoiding pitfalls when modelling ligands in macromolecular crystallography.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026Article
- Assessing Metal Ion Assignment Accuracy in Protein Data Bank Models via Elemental Spectroscopy.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Discovery and biosynthesis of a novel diaminopropane-modified thymine in phage DNA.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- KNexPHENIX: A PHENIX-Based Workflow for Improving Cryo-EM and Crystallographic Structural Models.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Crystallographic and EPR-based characterisation of CuInorganic chemistry frontiers · 2026Article
- RNAprecis: Prediction of full-detail RNA conformation from the experimentally best-observed sparse parameters.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Antiviral activity and mechanism of purine morpholine nucleoside analogues incorporating a sulfonamide fragment.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Regulation of BCL11A DNA binding and expression in human erythrocyte precursor HUDEP-2 cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Associating protein residues in the literature with structural data.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026Article
- New targets and procedures for validating the valence geometry of nucleic acid structures.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Immunoinformatics approach to engineer a multi-epitope vaccine against SdrG in skin commensal Staphylococcus epidermidis.PloS one · 2026Article
- Halogen bonds between ligands and proteins: Can we use them in validation?Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- Combining Network Pharmacology, Molecular Docking, and Integrative Studies to Explore the Mechanism ofFood science & nutrition · 2025Article
- A survey of crystallographic quality metrics from CIFs in the Cambridge Structural Database.IUCrJ · 2025Article
- Reconstructing biological molecules with help from video gamers.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2025Article
- KNexPHENIX: A PHENIX-Based Workflow for Improving Cryo-EM and Crystallographic Structural Models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Ten rules for a structural bioinformatic analysis.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
227 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This report presents the conclusions of the X-ray Validation Task Force of the worldwide Protein Data Bank (PDB). The PDB has expanded massively since current criteria for validation of deposited structures were adopted, allowing a much more sophisticated understanding of all the components of macromolecular crystals. The size of the PDB creates new opportunities to validate structures by comparison with the existing database, and the now-mandatory deposition of structure factors creates new opportunities to validate the underlying diffraction data. These developments highlighted the need for a new assessment of validation criteria. The Task Force recommends that a small set of validation data be presented in an easily understood format, relative to both the full PDB and the applicable resolution class, with greater detail available to interested users. Most importantly, we recommend that referees and editors judging the quality of structural experiments have access to a concise summary of well-established quality indicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.