ArticlePaediatric drugs2011
DTaP(5)-IPV-Hib vaccine (Pediacel®).
Article in Paediatric drugs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Glycoconjugate Vaccines for Prevention ofRussian journal of bioorganic chemistry · 2021Article
- Tandem truncated rotavirus VP8* subunit protein with T cell epitope as non-replicating parenteral vaccine is highly immunogenic.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2015Article
- Construction and characterization of human rotavirus recombinant VP8* subunit parenteral vaccine candidates.Vaccine · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediacel® is a fully liquid formulation of a diphtheria, tetanus, five-component acellular pertussis, inactivated poliovirus and Haemophilus influenzae type b combination vaccine, which does not require reconstitution. Both vial and prefilled syringe presentations of Pediacel® are available for use in the EU. In active-controlled clinical trials, primary and/or booster vaccination with Pediacel® was highly immunogenic, eliciting strong and sustained serologic responses against all its component toxoids/antigens when administered according to a variety of different schedules. In particular, pivotal studies showed that Pediacel® was generally similar and/or noninferior to reconstituted pentavalent and hexavalent diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis-based combination vaccines in terms of the seroprotection rates elicited against the diphtheria, tetanus, poliovirus, and Haemophilus influenzae type b components that these products have in common, as well as in terms of the seroresponse/booster response rates elicited against the acellular pertussis components that these products have in common. Differences in immune responses between Pediacel® and these vaccines were considered unlikely to be clinically significant. There was no clear evidence of clinically relevant changes in the immunogenicity of Pediacel® (or the coadministered vaccine) when given concomitantly with meningococcal group C conjugate, pneumococcal conjugate, or hepatitis B vaccines in clinical studies. Pediacel® was generally well tolerated and demonstrated low reactogenicity in clinical trials. It had an adverse event profile generally similar to that of other combination vaccines based on diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis vaccine, including Infanrix®-IPV+Hib and Infanrix® hexa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.