ReviewPaediatric drugs2011
Pediatric drug-resistant tuberculosis: a global perspective: a global perspective.
Review in Paediatric drugs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Isoniazid-resistant tuberculosis in children: a systematic review.The Pediatric infectious disease journal · 2013Pooled it
- Map the gap: missing children with drug-resistant tuberculosis.Public health action · 2015Article
- Commentary: a targets framework: dismantling the invisibility trap for children with drug-resistant tuberculosis.Journal of public health policy · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article was based on a presentation given at the 26th International Pediatric Association Conference of Pediatrics, Johannesburg, South Africa, 4-9 August 2010. In 2009, there were 9.4 million new cases of tuberculosis (TB) globally, and, of these, approximately 1 million were pediatric cases. Drug-resistant TB makes up a relatively small proportion of new TB cases, but is much more likely in previously treated cases. Pediatric TB remains difficult to diagnose microbiologically, with the result that detection of drug-resistant TB in children is an ongoing challenge. Since children diagnosed with TB predominantly represent recently acquired TB infection, they provide an important indication of drug-resistant TB prevalence and transmission within their communities. Drug-resistant TB is essentially a man-made problem, which consumes large amounts of healthcare resources. Recent technologic advances may pave the way to more rapid and accurate diagnosis of TB in children. Similarly, these advances are likely to result in improved detection of drug-resistant pediatric TB isolates. The treatment of pediatric drug-resistant TB requires prolonged courses of expensive and potentially toxic drugs, many of which are not available in child-friendly formulations. New anti-TB drugs are at various stages of pre-clinical development and will hopefully allow for shorter, more effective treatment regimens in the not too distant future. HIV-infected children are at extremely high risk for TB acquisition and subsequent progression to symptomatic disease; therefore, many cases of pediatric drug-resistant TB occur in HIV-infected children. This often results in complicated pharmacologic regimens (including anti-TB and antiretroviral drugs) that are difficult to comply with and may have unpredictable interactions. There are limited reports of long-term clinical outcomes of children diagnosed with drug-resistant TB, but improvements in the diagnosis and pharmacologic management of these cases have the potential to improve the quality of care offered to these children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.