SynthesisBMC health services research2011
How and why are communities of practice established in the healthcare sector? A systematic review of the literature.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02410941 (Improving the Stewardship of Diagnostic Imaging Resources in Alberta Emergency Departments), which is not on this map. Cited by 145 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving the Stewardship of Diagnostic Imaging Resources in Alberta Emergency Departments
Who cites it
145 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Communities of Practice in Long-Term Care-Exploring Frameworks, Barriers and Enablers: A Systematic Review.Australasian journal on ageing · 2026Pooled it
- The aims and effectiveness of communities of practice in healthcare: A systematic review.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- 10 years of mindlines: a systematic review and commentary.Implementation science : IS · 2015Pooled it
- Engaging primary care professionals in collaborative processes for optimising type 2 diabetes prevention practice: the PREDIAPS cluster randomised type II hybrid implementation trial.Implementation science : IS · 2018Trial
- Building capacity for leadership in family engagement in neurodevelopmental disability and child health research: A qualitative evaluation of the Family Engagement in Research Leadership Academy.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Oncogenetics training in Brazilian medical genetics residency programs: current landscape and challenges.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Paramedics in an emerging role; a reflexive thematic analysis of barriers and enablers to primary care innovation through a community of practice.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Knowledge, skills, and attitudinal gaps in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva diagnosis and management in the United States.JBMR plus · 2026Article
- Co-Design of a Community of Practice for People With Personal and Professional Expertise or Interest in Dementia in Australia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- A Community-Based, Multidisciplinary Training Program to Improve HIV Services for US-Based African Immigrants: Lessons Learned over 5 Years of Implementation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Advancing MRI diagnostic practices in rectal cancer: exploring the impact of web-based multi-reader study participation.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Communities of Practice and Living Labs: A Scoping Review of Principles and Methodologies for Involvement of Lived Experience Experts in Health and Healthcare Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- From theory to practice: A mixed-method evaluation of a program to implement high-intensity rehabilitation in skilled nursing facilities.Physical therapy · 2026Article
- Communities of Practice in Emergency Mental Health Care for Involuntary Patients in Common Law Countries: A Scoping Review of Evidence Gaps.Open access emergency medicine : OAEM · 2026Review
- Designing for implementation: development, delivery, and multi-method evaluation of a clinician training program for a novel technology-based concussion assessment tool.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Co-creating dementia knowledge and action in Ghana: Evidence from a participatory stakeholder workshop.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Knowledge-Sharing Practices Among Dentists, Pharmacists, and Allied Health Professionals: A Cross-Sectional Study in Eastern Cape Public Hospitals, South Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Article
- The role and position of palliative care nurses within the Dutch healthcare system: a mixed-methods study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
85 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCommunities of Practice (CoPs) are promoted in the healthcare sector as a means of generating and sharing knowledge and improving organisational performance. However CoPs vary considerably in the way they are structured and operate in the sector. If CoPs are to be cultivated to benefit healthcare organisations, there is a need to examine and understand their application to date. To this end, a systematic review of the literature on CoPs was conducted, to examine how and why CoPs have been established and whether they have been shown to improve healthcare practice.
methodsPeer-reviewed empirical research papers on CoPs in the healthcare sector were identified by searching electronic health-databases. Information on the purpose of establishing CoPs, their composition, methods by which members communicate and share information or knowledge, and research methods used to examine effectiveness was extracted and reviewed. Also examined was evidence of whether or not CoPs led to a change in healthcare practice.
resultsThirty-one primary research papers and two systematic reviews were identified and reviewed in detail. There was a trend from descriptive to evaluative research. The focus of CoPs in earlier publications was on learning and exchanging information and knowledge, whereas in more recently published research, CoPs were used more as a tool to improve clinical practice and to facilitate the implementation of evidence-based practice. Means by which members communicated with each other varied, but in none of the primary research studies was the method of communication examined in terms of the CoP achieving its objectives. Researchers are increasing their efforts to assess the effectiveness of CoPs in healthcare, however the interventions have been complex and multifaceted, making it difficult to directly attribute the change to the CoP.
conclusionsIn keeping with Wenger and colleagues' description, CoPs in the healthcare sector vary in form and purpose. While researchers are increasing their efforts to examine the impact of CoPs in healthcare, cultivating CoPs to improve healthcare performance requires a greater understanding of how to establish and support CoPs to maximise their potential to improve healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.