ArticlePloS one2011
On the significance of microtubule flexural behavior in cytoskeletal mechanics.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Form and function in biological filaments: a physicist's review.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025Review
- Emerging mechanomedicines informed by mechanotransduction along the integrin-cytoskeleton-nucleus axis.APL bioengineering · 2025Review
- KIF18A inhibition: the next big player in the search for cancer therapeutics.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2024Review
- Analysis of the Adherent Cell Response to the Substrate Stiffness Using Tensegrity.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Tubulin Post-translational Modifications: Potential Therapeutic Approaches to Heart Failure.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Geometrical nonlinear elasticity of axon under tension: A coarse-grained computational study.Biophysical journal · 2021Article
- Finite Element Simulations of Mechanical Behaviour of Endothelial Cells.BioMed research international · 2021Article
- Capturing 3D large-strain Euler-bending filament dynamics in fibrous media simulations; sample case of compression collapse in dendritic actin network.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Detyrosinated microtubules buckle and bear load in contracting cardiomyocytes.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2016Article
- Buckling behavior of individual and bundled microtubules.Biophysical journal · 2015Article
- The talin dimer structure orientation is mechanically regulated.Biophysical journal · 2014Article
- Flexural rigidity measurements of biopolymers using gliding assays.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2012Article
- Computational modeling of axonal microtubule bundles under tension.Biophysical journal · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative description of cell mechanics has challenged biological scientists for the past two decades. Various structural models have been attempted to analyze the structure of the cytoskeleton. One important aspect that has been largely ignored in all these modeling approaches is related to the flexural and buckling behavior of microtubular filaments. The objective of this paper is to explore the influence of this flexural and buckling behavior in cytoskeletal mechanics.In vitro the microtubules are observed to buckle in the first mode, reminiscent of a free, simply-supported beam. In vivo images of microtubules, however, indicate that the buckling mostly occurs in higher modes. This buckling mode switch takes place mostly because of the lateral support of microtubules via their connections to actin and intermediate filaments. These lateral loads are exerted throughout the microtubule length and yield a considerable bending behavior that, unless properly accounted for, would produce erroneous results in the modeling and analysis of the cytoskeletal mechanics.One of the promising attempts towards mechanical modeling of the cytoskeleton is the tensegrity model, which simplifies the complex network of cytoskeletal filaments into a combination merely of tension-bearing actin filaments and compression-bearing microtubules. Interestingly, this discrete model can qualitatively explain many experimental observations in cell mechanics. However, evidence suggests that the simplicity of this model may undermine the accuracy of its predictions, given the model's underlying assumption that "every single member bears solely either tensile or compressive behavior," i.e. neglecting the flexural behavior of the microtubule filaments. We invoke an anisotropic continuum model for microtubules and compare the bending energy stored in a single microtubule with its axial strain energy at the verge of buckling. Our results suggest that the bending energy can exceed the axial energy of microtubules by 40 folds. A modification to tensegrity model is, therefore, proved necessary in order to take into account the flexural response of microtubules. The concept of "bendo-tensegrity" is proposed as a modification to contemporary cytoskeletal tensegrity models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.