Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21998560›Full record

ReviewPLoS computational biology2011

A multi-cell, multi-scale model of vertebrate segmentation and somite formation.

Susan D Hester, Julio M Belmonte, J Scott Gens, Sherry G Clendenon, James A Glazier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS computational biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evolvability in vertebrate segmentation.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Generative models of morphogenesis in developmental biology.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susan D HesterBiocomplexity Institute and Department of Physics, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America. sdhester@umail.iu.edu
Julio M Belmonte
J Scott Gens
Sherry G Clendenon
James A Glazier

Funding

MSM - Multiscale Studies of Segmentation in Vertebrate *R01GM076692 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI GLAZIER, JAMES ALEXANDER, STERN, CLAUDIO D · 2005 to 2015
$5.5M
Development and Improvement of Tissue Simulation ToolkitR01GM077138 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI D'SOUZA, ROSHAN M, GLAZIER, JAMES ALEXANDER · 2007 to 2015
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01 GM077138-01A1NIGMS NIH HHS 5R01 GM076692-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076692NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somitogenesis, the formation of the body's primary segmental structure common to all vertebrate development, requires coordination between biological mechanisms at several scales. Explaining how these mechanisms interact across scales and how events are coordinated in space and time is necessary for a complete understanding of somitogenesis and its evolutionary flexibility. So far, mechanisms of somitogenesis have been studied independently. To test the consistency, integrability and combined explanatory power of current prevailing hypotheses, we built an integrated clock-and-wavefront model including submodels of the intracellular segmentation clock, intercellular segmentation-clock coupling via Delta/Notch signaling, an FGF8 determination front, delayed differentiation, clock-wavefront readout, and differential-cell-cell-adhesion-driven cell sorting. We identify inconsistencies between existing submodels and gaps in the current understanding of somitogenesis mechanisms, and propose novel submodels and extensions of existing submodels where necessary. For reasonable initial conditions, 2D simulations of our model robustly generate spatially and temporally regular somites, realistic dynamic morphologies and spontaneous emergence of anterior-traveling stripes of Lfng. We show that these traveling stripes are pseudo-waves rather than true propagating waves. Our model is flexible enough to generate interspecies-like variation in somite size in response to changes in the PSM growth rate and segmentation-clock period, and in the number and width of Lfng stripes in response to changes in the PSM growth rate, segmentation-clock period and PSM length.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsBiological ClocksBody PatterningCell AdhesionCell Adhesion MoleculesCell DivisionCell MovementComputational BiologyFibroblast Growth Factor 8Gene Expression RegulationIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMesodermReceptors, NotchRNA, MessengerCell Adhesion Moleculesdelta proteinFibroblast Growth Factor 8Intracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMembrane ProteinsReceptors, NotchRNA, MessengerWnt3A Protein

Identifiers

PMID21998560
PMCPMC3188485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.