Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21998559›Full record

ReviewPLoS computational biology2011

Change in allosteric network affects binding affinities of PDZ domains: analysis through perturbation response scanning.

Z Nevin Gerek, S Banu Ozkan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS computational biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Selective control of ligand binding through a distal mutation that alters the protein native ensemble.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. A protein dynamics-based deep learning model enhances predictions of fitness and epistasis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Z Nevin GerekCenter for Biological Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.
S Banu Ozkan

Funding

Center for the Rational Design of Membrane Protein CrystallographyU54GM094599 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI FROMME, PETRA · 2010 to 2014
$6.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1U54GM094599NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM094599
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The allosteric mechanism plays a key role in cellular functions of several PDZ domain proteins (PDZs) and is directly linked to pharmaceutical applications; however, it is a challenge to elaborate the nature and extent of these allosteric interactions. One solution to this problem is to explore the dynamics of PDZs, which may provide insights about how intramolecular communication occurs within a single domain. Here, we develop an advancement of perturbation response scanning (PRS) that couples elastic network models with linear response theory (LRT) to predict key residues in allosteric transitions of the two most studied PDZs (PSD-95 PDZ3 domain and hPTP1E PDZ2 domain). With PRS, we first identify the residues that give the highest mean square fluctuation response upon perturbing the binding sites. Strikingly, we observe that the residues with the highest mean square fluctuation response agree with experimentally determined residues involved in allosteric transitions. Second, we construct the allosteric pathways by linking the residues giving the same directional response upon perturbation of the binding sites. The predicted intramolecular communication pathways reveal that PSD-95 and hPTP1E have different pathways through the dynamic coupling of different residue pairs. Moreover, our analysis provides a molecular understanding of experimentally observed hidden allostery of PSD-95. We show that removing the distal third alpha helix from the binding site alters the allosteric pathway and decreases the binding affinity. Overall, these results indicate that (i) dynamics plays a key role in allosteric regulations of PDZs, (ii) the local changes in the residue interactions can lead to significant changes in the dynamics of allosteric regulations, and (iii) this might be the mechanism that each PDZ uses to tailor their binding specificities regulation.

Indexed as

Allosteric RegulationAmino Acid SequenceComputational BiologyHumansModels, BiologicalModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularPDZ DomainsProtein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 13Signal TransductionProtein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 13PTPN13 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID21998559
PMCPMC3188487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.