ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2011
Three-year history of transcription-mediated amplification-based Trichomonas vaginalis analyte-specific reagent testing in a subacute care patient population.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis in liquid-based Papanicolaou samples in Shiraz, southern Iran.BMC women's health · 2023Article
- Expansion of Comprehensive Screening of Male Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinic Attendees with Mycoplasma genitalium and Trichomonas vaginalis Molecular Assessment: a Retrospective Analysis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2017Article
- Clinical Laboratory Assessment of Mycoplasma genitalium Transcription-Mediated Amplification Using Primary Female Urogenital Specimens.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2016Article
- Suboptimal Trichomonas vaginalis Antigen Test Performance in a Low-Prevalence Sexually Transmitted Infection Community.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2016Article
- Retrospective assessment of transcription-mediated amplification-based screening for Trichomonas vaginalis in male sexually transmitted infection clinic patients.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2013Article
- Screening of male patients for Trichomonas vaginalis with transcription-mediated amplification in a community with a high prevalence of sexually transmitted infection.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2013Article
- Female epidemiology of transcription-mediated amplification-based Trichomonas vaginalis detection in a metropolitan setting with a high prevalence of sexually transmitted infection.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A total of 7,899 specimens submitted for live clinical Trichomonas vaginalis analyte-specific reagent (ASR) screening from 2008 to 2010 were audited on the basis of patient gender, specimen source, molecular Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis results, and relative light unit (RLU) data yielded by T. vaginalis ASR. Only 1.4% of the screening was ordered by emergency department clinicians. The screening volume in 2010 was 126% higher than that in 2008. The proportions of annual female and male screening remained consistent throughout the 3-year interval (∼92 and 8%, respectively). Although 71.8 and 9.5% of screening was performed on endocervical and vaginal specimens, respectively, over the 3-year period, no significant difference was noted in the T. vaginalis detection rates (8.9 and 8.6%, P = 0.85). Increased T. vaginalis detection was derived from female urine specimens (12.6%) compared to female genital swabs (P = 0.0004). The proportion of female urine screening increased during the 3-year interval (P < 0.0002). T. vaginalis detection rate in males was 6.6%, with no difference between urethral and urine T. vaginalis detection (P = 0.53). The mean RLU value for 714 positive specimens was 3,971,441; analogous values for each female specimen source and combined male source testing showed no variance (P ≥ 0.29). Combined-gender T. vaginalis detection rate (9.1%) was significantly greater than those of C. trachomatis (5.9%) and N. gonorrhoeae (1.5%; P < 0.0002). Equivocal results presented at a rate of 0.4%. T. vaginalis ASR is an increasingly utilized assay that yields higher detection rates than other sexually transmitted infection etiologies in this community subacute care setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.