ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2011
Extraction of data deposition statements from the literature: a method for automatically tracking research results.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomedical text mining for research rigor and integrity: tasks, challenges, directions.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Automatic recognition of self-acknowledged limitations in clinical research literature.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018Article
- Database citation in supplementary data linked to Europe PubMed Central full text biomedical articles.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2015Article
- Sizing the Problem of Improving Discovery and Access to NIH-Funded Data: A Preliminary Study.PloS one · 2015Article
- Overview of the gene ontology task at BioCreative IV.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2014Article
- BC4GO: a full-text corpus for the BioCreative IV GO task.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2014Article
- An analysis on the entity annotations in biological corpora.F1000Research · 2014Review
- Experimental design-based functional mining and characterization of high-throughput sequencing data in the sequence read archive.PloS one · 2013Article
- Database citation in full text biomedical articles.PloS one · 2013Article
- Automatic categorization of diverse experimental information in the bioscience literature.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
- Improving links between literature and biological data with text mining: a case study with GEO, PDB and MEDLINE.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationResearch in the biomedical domain can have a major impact through open sharing of the data produced. For this reason, it is important to be able to identify instances of data production and deposition for potential re-use. Herein, we report on the automatic identification of data deposition statements in research articles.
resultsWe apply machine learning algorithms to sentences extracted from full-text articles in PubMed Central in order to automatically determine whether a given article contains a data deposition statement, and retrieve the specific statements. With an Support Vector Machine classifier using conditional random field determined deposition features, articles containing deposition statements are correctly identified with 81% F-measure. An error analysis shows that almost half of the articles classified as containing a deposition statement by our method but not by the gold standard do indeed contain a deposition statement. In addition, our system was used to process articles in PubMed Central, predicting that a total of 52 932 articles report data deposition, many of which are not currently included in the Secondary Source Identifier [si] field for MEDLINE citations. AVAILABILITY: All annotated datasets described in this study are freely available from the NLM/NCBI website at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/CBBresearch/Fellows/Neveol/DepositionDataSets.zip CONTACT: aurelie.neveol@nih.gov; john.wilbur@nih.gov; zhiyong.lu@nih.gov SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.