Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21998156›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2011

Extraction of data deposition statements from the literature: a method for automatically tracking research results.

Aurélie Névéol, W John Wilbur, Zhiyong Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Automatic recognition of self-acknowledged limitations in clinical research literature.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Overview of the gene ontology task at BioCreative IV.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2014
    Article
  6. BC4GO: a full-text corpus for the BioCreative IV GO task.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2014
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aurélie NévéolNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland 20894, USA. aurelie.neveol@nih.gov
W John Wilbur
Zhiyong Lu

Funding

National Biomedical Information ServicesZIHLM200888 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI PALTOO, DINA · 2009 to 2025
$5200.7M
Named Entity Recognition and Relationship Extraction in BiomedicineZIALM000002 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI LU, ZHIYONG · 2011 to 2012
$1.5M
Intramural NIH HHSNLM NIH HHS LM000002-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationResearch in the biomedical domain can have a major impact through open sharing of the data produced. For this reason, it is important to be able to identify instances of data production and deposition for potential re-use. Herein, we report on the automatic identification of data deposition statements in research articles.

resultsWe apply machine learning algorithms to sentences extracted from full-text articles in PubMed Central in order to automatically determine whether a given article contains a data deposition statement, and retrieve the specific statements. With an Support Vector Machine classifier using conditional random field determined deposition features, articles containing deposition statements are correctly identified with 81% F-measure. An error analysis shows that almost half of the articles classified as containing a deposition statement by our method but not by the gold standard do indeed contain a deposition statement. In addition, our system was used to process articles in PubMed Central, predicting that a total of 52 932 articles report data deposition, many of which are not currently included in the Secondary Source Identifier [si] field for MEDLINE citations. AVAILABILITY: All annotated datasets described in this study are freely available from the NLM/NCBI website at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/CBBresearch/Fellows/Neveol/DepositionDataSets.zip CONTACT: aurelie.neveol@nih.gov; john.wilbur@nih.gov; zhiyong.lu@nih.gov SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDatabases, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataPubMedSupport Vector MachineArtificial IntelligenceAutomationMEDLINENational Library of Medicine (U.S.)United States

Identifiers

PMID21998156
PMCPMC3223368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.