Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21997857›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational chemistry2012

Molecular dynamics simulation of hydrated DPPC monolayers using charge equilibration force fields.

Timothy R Lucas, Brad A Bauer, Joseph E Davis, Sandeep Patel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational chemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Timothy R LucasDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, USA.
Brad A Bauer
Joseph E Davis
Sandeep Patel

Funding

TOWARDS SOLID-STATE NMR STRUCTURES OF GPCRSP20RR015588 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI ROZOVSKY, SHARON · 2000 to 2009
$18.2M
UDE COBRE: STRAINED MOLECULES FOR SYNTHESIS OF UNNATURAL AMINO ACIDSP20RR017716 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI BEEBE, THOMAS PAUL · 2002 to 2011
$16.9M
NCRR NIH HHS 5P20RR017716-07NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR015588NCRR NIH HHS P20-RR015588NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR017716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present results of molecular dynamics simulations of a model DPPC-water monolayer using charge equilibration (CHEQ) force fields, which explicitly account for electronic polarization in a classical treatment of intermolecular interactions. The surface pressure, determined as the difference between the monolayer and pure water surface tensions at 323 K, is predicted to be 22.92 ±1.29 dyne/cm, just slightly below the broad range of experimental values reported for this system. The surface tension for the DPPC-water monolayer is predicted to be 42.35 ±1.16 dyne/cm, in close agreement with the experimentally determined value of 40.9 dyne/cm. This surface tension is also consistent with the value obtained from DPPC monolayer simulations using state-of-the-art nonpolarizable force fields. The current results of simulations predict a monolayer-water potential difference relative to the pure water-air interface of 0.64 ±0.02 Volts, an improved prediction compared to the fixed-charge CHARMM27 force field, yet still overestimating the experimental range of 0.3 to 0.45 Volts. As the charge equilibration model is a purely charge-based model for polarization, the current results suggest that explicitly modeled polarization effects can offer improvements in describing interfacial electrostatics in such systems.

Indexed as

Membranes, ArtificialMolecular Dynamics Simulation1,2-DipalmitoylphosphatidylcholineWater1,2-DipalmitoylphosphatidylcholineMembranes, ArtificialWater

Identifiers

PMID21997857
PMCPMC3488352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.