ArticleProteins2011
Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)--round IX.
Article in Proteins, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
101 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep-learning-based single-domain and multidomain protein structure prediction with D-I-TASSER.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Mass Spectrometry- and Structural Biology-Based Investigation of Proteins.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Petabase-Scale Homology Search for Structure Prediction.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024Review
- Article
- Petascale Homology Search for Structure Prediction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Illuminating the "Twilight Zone": Advances in Difficult Protein Modeling.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Where to From Here?Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
- An Overview of Alphafold's Breakthrough.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2022Review
- Modeling SARS-CoV-2 proteins in the CASP-commons experiment.Proteins · 2021Article
- Folding non-homologous proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations.Cell reports methods · 2021Article
- P3CMQA: Single-Model Quality Assessment Using 3DCNN with Profile-Based Features.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Patterns in Protein Flexibility: A Comparison of NMR "Ensembles", MD Trajectories, and Crystallographic B-Factors.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- OCLSTM: Optimized convolutional and long short-term memory neural network model for protein secondary structure prediction.PloS one · 2021Article
- Conservation of binding properties in protein models.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- Computational Methods for the Elucidation of Protein Structure and Interactions.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Review
- Predicting binding sites from unbound versus bound protein structures.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Structure of the Hydrophobic Core Determines the 3D Protein Structure-Verification by Single Mutation Proteins.Biomolecules · 2020Article
- I-TASSER gateway: A protein structure and function prediction server powered by XSEDE.Future generations computer systems : FGCS · 2019Article
- Identification and localization of Tospovirus genus-wide conserved residues in 3D models of the nucleocapsid and the silencing suppressor proteins.Virology journal · 2019Article
- Article
41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article is an introduction to the special issue of the journal PROTEINS, dedicated to the ninth Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP) experiment to assess the state of the art in protein structure modeling. The article describes the conduct of the experiment, the categories of prediction included, and outlines the evaluation and assessment procedures. Methods for modeling protein structure continue to advance, although at a more modest pace than in the early CASP experiments. CASP developments of note are indications of improvement in model accuracy for some classes of target, an improved ability to choose the most accurate of a set of generated models, and evidence of improvement in accuracy for short "new fold" models. In addition, a new analysis of regions of models not derivable from the most obvious template structure has revealed better performance than expected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.