ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2012
A new incremental test for VO₂max accurate measurement by increasing VO₂max plateau duration, allowing the investigation of its limiting factors.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Exploring the physiological limits of aging: a case study of the male 50-km world record in the 80+ age category.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Overestimation of maximal aerobic speed by the Université de Montréal track test and a 1500-m-time trial in soccer.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Maximal Time Spent at VOInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- A Potential Endurance Algorithm Prediction in the Field of Sports Performance.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Gas analyzer's drift leads to systematic error in maximal oxygen uptake and maximal respiratory exchange ratio determination.Frontiers in physiology · 2015Article
- Is the VO2max that we measure really maximal?Frontiers in physiology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to (1) validate a new exercise protocol for accurate measurement of VO(2max) by obtention of a VO(2max) plateau for all subjects fit and unfit (2) test the hypothesis that VO(2max) plateau duration is not correlated with VO(2max) and (3) verify that limiting factors of VO(2max) plateau duration are different from those of VO(2max) amplitude. Therefore, 14 subjects performed two incremental cycling tests: (1) a classical incremental test (CIT) to determine VO(2max), the power at VO(2max) (PVO(2max)) and at the lactate threshold (PLT) (2) a new incremental test (NIT) in which the power was decreased just after the subject reached VO(2max). During both protocols, heart rate, stroke volume, cardiac output, the arterio-venous difference and the oxygen blood saturation were recorded. The results showed that, with the NIT, subject could maintain a long VO(2max) plateau (6 ± 3 min), even those who could not reach VO(2max) plateau at the end of CIT (n = 5). The VO(2max) plateau duration was not correlated with VO(2max) amplitude which was correlated with the power at SV(max) (r = 0.888, p < 0.001). The VO(2max) plateau duration was correlated with the power decrease (W/s) during the VO(2max) plateau (r = -0.72, p = 0.003) but not with cardiac-related factors nor with PVO(2max). In conclusion, these experiments showed that it was possible to get a long VO(2max) plateau at the end of NIT whatever the individual VO(2max) amplitude was. The limiting factor of VO(2max) duration was the power output.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21997677What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.