Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21997384›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2012

Allergic contact dermatitis: epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, in vitro methods and regulatory aspects. Current knowledge assembled at an international workshop at BfR, Germany.

M Peiser, T Tralau, J Heidler, A M Api, J H E Arts, D A Basketter, J English, T L Diepgen, R C Fuhlbrigge, A A Gaspari and 14 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Cyanoacrylate glue reactions: A systematic review, cases, and proposed mechanisms.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Incidence of occupational contact dermatitis in healthcare workers: a systematic review.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Salivary Immune and Endocrine Biomarkers in Skin and Mucocutaneous Diseases.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. CD1a and Lipids as Mediators of T Cell Activation in the Skin.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. A Practical Approach to Chronic Hand Eczema.Dermatology and therapy · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. La Tunisie medicale · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

M PeiserDepartment of Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Thielallee 88-92, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
T Tralau
J Heidler
A M Api
J H E Arts
D A Basketter
J English
T L Diepgen
R C Fuhlbrigge
A A Gaspari
J D Johansen
A T Karlberg
I Kimber
J P Lepoittevin
M Liebsch
H I Maibach
S F Martin
H F Merk
T Platzek
T Rustemeyer
A Schnuch
R J Vandebriel
I R White
A Luch

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contact allergies are complex diseases, and one of the important challenges for public health and immunology. The German 'Federal Institute for Risk Assessment' hosted an 'International Workshop on Contact Dermatitis'. The scope of the workshop was to discuss new discoveries and developments in the field of contact dermatitis. This included the epidemiology and molecular biology of contact allergy, as well as the development of new in vitro methods. Furthermore, it considered regulatory aspects aiming to reduce exposure to contact sensitisers. An estimated 15-20% of the general population suffers from contact allergy. Workplace exposure, age, sex, use of consumer products and genetic predispositions were identified as the most important risk factors. Research highlights included: advances in understanding of immune responses to contact sensitisers, the importance of autoxidation or enzyme-mediated oxidation for the activation of chemicals, the mechanisms through which hapten-protein conjugates are formed and the development of novel in vitro strategies for the identification of skin-sensitising chemicals. Dendritic cell cultures and structure-activity relationships are being developed to identify potential contact allergens. However, the local lymph node assay (LLNA) presently remains the validated method of choice for hazard identification and characterisation. At the workshop the use of the LLNA for regulatory purposes and for quantitative risk assessment was also discussed.

Indexed as

AllergensCongresses as TopicDermatitis, Allergic ContactHumansImmunity, InnateKeratinocytesLocal Lymph Node AssayNatural Killer T-CellsRisk FactorsAllergens

Identifiers

PMID21997384
PMCPMC3276771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.