Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21997132›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the National Cancer Institute2011

Outcomes among black patients with stage II and III colon cancer receiving chemotherapy: an analysis of ACCENT adjuvant trials.

Greg Yothers, Daniel J Sargent, Norman Wolmark, Richard M Goldberg, Michael J O'Connell, Jacqueline K Benedetti, Leonard B Saltz, James J Dignam, A William Blackstock, ACCENT Collaborative Group

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00002593 (Phase III Randomized Trial of 5-FU/Leucovorin/Levamisole Versus 5-FU Continuous Infusion/Levamisole as Adjuvant Therapy for High-Risk Resectable Colon Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00002593 phase3completednot on this map

Phase III Randomized Trial of 5-FU/Leucovorin/Levamisole Versus 5-FU Continuous Infusion/Levamisole as Adjuvant Therapy for High-Risk Resectable Colon Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorSWOG Cancer Research NetworkRan1994 to 2005Enrolled1,135ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsfluorouracil, leucovorin calcium, levamisole hydrochloride
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Black-White disparities across the colorectal cancer care continuum in the USA.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Underutilization of Guideline-Recommended Mismatch Repair/Microsatellite Instability Biomarker Testing in Advanced Colorectal Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  10. Healthcare Disparities and Colorectal Cancer.Surgical oncology clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Survival Among Patients With Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2016
    Article
  20. Colorectal cancer survival in Jamaica.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Greg YothersNational Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Biostatistical Center, One Sterling Plaza, 201 N Craig St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. yothers@nsabp.pitt.edu
Daniel J Sargent
Norman Wolmark
Richard M Goldberg
Michael J O'Connell
Jacqueline K Benedetti
Leonard B Saltz
James J Dignam
A William Blackstock
ACCENT Collaborative Group
Drexel University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNSABP Foundation · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Washington · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

PRIMARY CANCER THERAPY GROUP--NSABP (HEADQUARTERS)U10CA012027 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WOLMARK, NORMAN · 1985 to 2012
$117.2M
NSABP Foreign AccrualsU10CA037377 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WOLMARK, NORMAN · 1985 to 2014
$116.5M
TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHU10CA025224 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BUCKNER, JAN C · 1985 to 2013
$85.0M
STUDY TO ASSESS RALOXIFENE FOR PREVENTING BREAST CANCERU10CA069974 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COSTANTINO, JOSEPH P. · 1995 to 2013
$62.4M
PRIMARY BREAST CANCER THERAPY--BIOSTATISTICS CENTERU10CA069651 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COSTANTINO, JOSEPH P. · 1995 to 2012
$52.1M
NSABP Biological Specimen BanksU24CA114732 · NCI · NSABP FOUNDATION, INC. · PI WOLMARK, NORMAN · 2005 to 2014
$9.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA 25224NCI NIH HHS U10CA-12027NCI NIH HHS U10CA-37377NCI NIH HHS U10CA-69651NCI NIH HHS U10CA-69974NCI NIH HHS U24-CA-114732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmong patients with resected colon cancer, black patients have worse survival than whites. We investigated whether disparities in survival and related endpoints would persist when patients were treated with identical therapies in controlled clinical trials.

methodsWe assessed 14,611 patients (1218 black and 13,393 white) who received standardized adjuvant treatment in 12 randomized controlled clinical trials conducted in North America for resected stage II and stage III colon cancer between 1977 and 2002. Individual patient data on covariates and outcomes were extracted from the Adjuvant Colon Cancer ENdpoinTs (ACCENT) database. The endpoints examined in this meta-analysis were overall survival (time to death), recurrence-free survival (time to recurrence or death), and recurrence-free interval (time to recurrence). Cox models were stratified by study and controlled for sex, stage, age, and treatment to determine the effect of race. Kaplan-Meier estimates were adjusted for similar covariates to control for confounding. All statistical tests were two-sided.

resultsBlack patients were younger than whites (median age, 58 vs 61 years, respectively; P < .001) and more likely to be female (55% vs 45%, respectively; P < .001). Overall survival was worse in black patients than whites (hazard ratio [HR] of death = 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11 to 1.34, P < .001). Five-year overall survival rates for blacks and whites were 68.2% and 72.8%, respectively. When subsets defined by sex, stage, and age were analyzed, overall survival was consistently worse in black patients. Recurrence-free survival was worse in black patients than whites (HR of recurrence or death = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.24, P = .0045). Three-year recurrence-free survival rates in blacks and whites were 68.4% and 72.1%, respectively. In contrast, recurrence-free interval was similar in black and white patients (HR of recurrence = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.97 to 1.19, P = .15). Three-year recurrence-free interval rates in blacks and whites were 71.3% and 74.2%, respectively.

conclusionsBlack patients with resected stage II and stage III colon cancer who were treated with the same therapy as white patients experienced worse overall and recurrence-free survival, but similar recurrence-free interval, compared with white patients. The differences in survival may be mostly because of factors unrelated to the patients' adjuvant colon cancer treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBlack or African AmericanChemotherapy, AdjuvantClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicColonic NeoplasmsConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFluorouracilHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Status DisparitiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLeucovorinFluorouracilLeucovorinLevamisoleLomustineVincristine

Identifiers

PMID21997132
PMCPMC3196480
OpenAlexW2125126831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.