Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21996696›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of infectious diseases2011

Reporter phage and breath tests: emerging phenotypic assays for diagnosing active tuberculosis, antibiotic resistance, and treatment efficacy.

Paras Jain, David S Thaler, Mamoudou Maiga, Graham S Timmins, William R Bishai, Graham F Hatfull, Michelle H Larsen, William R Jacobs

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Molecular Genetics of Mycobacteriophages.Microbiology spectrum · 2014
    Article
  13. Review
  14. True facets of TB diagnosis in 2012: Hypes and realities.European journal of microbiology & immunology · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Paras JainDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461, USA.
David S Thaler
Mamoudou Maiga
Graham S Timmins
William R Bishai
Graham F Hatfull
Michelle H Larsen
William R Jacobs
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of New Mexico · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Molecular Genetic Analysis of Mycobacterium TuberculosisR37AI026170 · NIAID · ALBERT EINSTEIN COL OF MED YESHIVA UNIV · PI WILLIAM Robert JACOBS · 2004 to 2026
$7.7M
MOLECULAR GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSISR01AI026170 · NIAID · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI JACOBS, WILLIAM ROBERT · 1989 to 2022
$7.1M
MOLECULAR GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSISR22AI026170 · NIAID · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI JACOBS, WILLIAM ROBERT · 1989 to 1991
–
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIAID NIH HHS AI26170NIAID NIH HHS AI59877NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI026170NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI026170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid and accurate diagnosis of active tuberculosis (TB) and its drug susceptibility remain a challenge. Phenotypic assays allow determination of antibiotic susceptibilities even if sequence data are not available or informative. We review 2 emerging diagnostic approaches, reporter phage and breath tests, both of which assay mycobacterial metabolism. The reporter phage signal, Green fluorescent protein (GFP) or β-galactosidase, indicates transcription and translation inside the recipient bacilli and its attenuation by antibiotics. Different breath tests assay, (1) exhaled antigen 85, (2) mycobacterial urease activity, and (3) detection by trained rats of disease-specific odor in sputum, have also been developed. When compared with culture, reporter phage assays shorten the time for initial diagnosis of drug susceptibility by several days. Both reporter phage and breath tests have promise as early markers to determine the efficacy of treatment. While sputum often remains smear and Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA positive early in the course of efficacious antituberculous treatment, we predict that both breath and phage tests will rapidly become negative. If this hypothesis proves correct, phage assays and breath tests could become important surrogate markers in early bactericidal activity (EBA) studies of new antibiotics.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntitubercular AgentsBreath TestsFlow CytometryGenes, ReporterHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycobacteriophagesMycobacterium tuberculosisPhenotypeRatsTuberculosisAntitubercular Agents

Identifiers

PMID21996696
PMCPMC3247800
OpenAlexW2100672144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.