ArticleUrology2011
Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial perioperative and pathologic results.
Article in Urology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Simplified posterior urethroplasty utilizing laparoscopic instrumentation.Translational andrology and urology · 2021Article
- Transurethral Anastomosis after Transurethral Radical Prostatectomy: A Phantom Study on Intraluminal Suturing With Concentric Tube Robots.IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics · 2020Article
- The transrectal single-port laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a cadaver model.Turkish journal of urology · 2016Article
- Advances in laparoscopic urologic surgery techniques.F1000Research · 2016Review
- The transrectal single port laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a cadaver model.Turkish journal of urology · 2015Article
- [Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in urology: feasability of a transrectal, flexible retroperitoneoscopy in a porcine model].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2014Article
- Urological applications of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).Nature reviews. Urology · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo describe the first clinical experience, pathologic, and perioperative outcomes of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) radical prostatectomy. NOTES represents the evolution of minimally invasive surgery. The conceptual feasibility has been shown in careful laboratory and animal studies, but a scarcity of information regarding clinical applications exists.
methodsAfter institutional review board approval, 2 patients agreed to undergo NOTES radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. The prostate was radically resected using a 26F resectoscope, 550-μm laser fiber, and holmium laser. The prostate was delivered into the bladder and removed at the conclusion of the procedure through a suprapubic cystotomy for histopathologic analysis. The vesicourethral anastomosis was completed using a cannula scope, urethral-vesical suturing device, and titanium knot applier. Cystograms were taken immediately postoperatively and at catheter removal.
resultsBoth patients tolerated the procedure without operative complications. All intraoperative cystograms showed watertight anastomoses. The pathologic examination revealed Gleason score 3 + 3 and Stage pT2aNxMx for 1 patient and Gleason score 3 + 4 and Stage pT2cNxMx for 1 patient, with negative margins for both. No blood transfusions were required. Patient 2 experienced some left-sided gluteal and suprapubic pain postoperatively.
conclusionNOTES radical prostatectomy appears to be a safe and feasible option for the management of carefully selected, organ-confined prostate cancer. The perioperative and pathologic outcomes show promise with this new technique; however, the high standards of oncologic and functional outcomes demand close and longer follow-up before adoption into the surgical armamentarium can be recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.