ArticleThe patient2011
Can patients diagnosed with schizophrenia complete choice-based conjoint analysis tasks?
Article in The patient, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- What attributes should be included in a discrete choice experiment related to health technologies? A systematic literature review.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- The Role of Qualitative Research Methods in Discrete Choice Experiments.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2017Pooled it
- Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.PharmacoEconomics · 2014Pooled it
- Factors Influencing Patient and Caregiver Preferences for Antipsychotic Treatment of Schizophrenia in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.Patient preference and adherence · 2023Article
- Development of attributes and levels of mental health insurance services using a discrete choice experiment.Journal of education and health promotion · 2023Article
- Computerized Conjoint Analysis of the Weight Treatment Preferences of Individuals With Schizophrenia.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2021Article
- The capacity of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder individuals to make autonomous decisions about pharmacological treatments for their illness in real life: A scoping review.Health science reports · 2020Article
- A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words: The Role of Survey Training Materials in Stated-Preference Studies.The patient · 2020Article
- Analysis of Patient Preferences in Lung Cancer - Estimating Acceptable Tradeoffs Between Treatment Benefit and Side Effects.Patient preference and adherence · 2020Article
- Preferences for family involvement among veterans in treatment for schizophrenia.Psychiatric rehabilitation journal · 2019Article
- Article
- Patient preferences for important attributes of bipolar depression treatments: a discrete choice experiment.Patient preference and adherence · 2018Article
- Physician and patient benefit-risk preferences from two randomized long-acting injectable antipsychotic trials.Patient preference and adherence · 2016Article
- Patient preferences for treating refractory overactive bladder in the UK.International urology and nephrology · 2015Article
- Article
- Caregiver preferences for emerging duchenne muscular dystrophy treatments: a comparison of best-worst scaling and conjoint analysis.The patient · 2015Article
- Elderly patients' experiences using adaptive conjoint analysis software as a decision aid for osteoarthritis of the knee.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2014Article
- A test of concordance between patient and psychiatrist valuations of multiple treatment goals for schizophrenia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSchizophrenia is a severe mental illness associated with hallucinations, delusions, apathy, poor social functioning, and impaired cognition. Researchers and funders have been hesitant to focus efforts on treatment preferences of patients with schizophrenia because of the perceived cognitive burden that research methods, such as conjoint analysis, place on them.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to test if patients diagnosed with schizophrenia were able to complete a choice-based conjoint analysis (often referred to as discrete-choice experiments) and to test if meaningful trade-offs were being made.
methodsGerman outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia were eligible to participate in this study if they were aged 18-65 years, had received treatment for at least 1 year and were not experiencing acute symptoms. Conjoint analysis tasks were based on six attributes, each with two levels, which were identified via a literature review and focus groups. A psychologist in a professional interview facility presented each respondent with the eight tasks with little explanation. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed to verify that respondents understood the tasks. Preferences were assessed using logistic regression, with a correction for clustering.
resultsWe found evidence that the 21 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia participating in the study could complete conjoint analysis tasks in a meaningful way. Patients not only related to the scenarios presented in conjoint tasks, but explicitly stated that they used their own preferences to judge which scenarios were better. Statistical analysis confirmed all hypotheses about the attributes (i.e. all attributes had the expected sign). Having a supportive physician, not feeling slowed, and improvements in stressful situations (p < 0.01) were the most important attributes.
conclusionsWe found that patients diagnosed with schizophrenia can complete conjoint analysis tasks, that they base their decisions on their own preferences, and that patients make trade-offs between attributes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.