Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21994594›Full record

ArticleViruses2009

Viral hybrid vectors for somatic integration - are they the better solution?

Nadine Müther, Nadja Noske, Anja Ehrhardt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hybrid nonviral/viral vector systems for improved piggyBac DNA transposon in vivo delivery.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2015
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nadine MütherMax von Pettenkofer-Institut, Department of Virology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Pettenkoferstr. 9A, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Nadja Noske
Anja Ehrhardt

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The turbulent history of clinical trials in viral gene therapy has taught us important lessons about vector design and safety issues. Much effort was spent on analyzing genotoxicity after somatic integration of therapeutic DNA into the host genome. Based on these findings major improvements in vector design including the development of viral hybrid vectors for somatic integration have been achieved. This review provides a state-of-the-art overview of available hybrid vectors utilizing viruses for high transduction efficiencies in concert with various integration machineries for random and targeted integration patterns. It discusses advantages but also limitations of each vector system.

Indexed as

adeno-associated virusadenovirusherpes simplex virushybrid vectorPhiC31 integraseretrovirusSleeping Beauty transposasesomatic integrationtargeted integrationzinc-finger nuclease

Identifiers

PMID21994594
PMCPMC3185507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.