Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21994429›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes care2011

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of high-dose human regular U-500 insulin versus human regular U-100 insulin in healthy obese subjects.

Amparo de la Peña, Matthew Riddle, Linda A Morrow, Honghua H Jiang, Helle Linnebjerg, Adam Scott, Khin M Win, Marcus Hompesch, Kenneth F Mace, Jennie G Jacobson and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes care, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical use of U-500 regular insulin: review and meta-analysis.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2012
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Insulin depot absorption modeling and pharmacokinetic simulation with insulin glargine 300 U/mL
.International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2019
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Prandial Insulins: A Person-Centered Choice.Current diabetes reports · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. One hundred years of insulin therapy.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Clinical Impact of Initiation of U-500 Insulin vs Continuation of U-100 Insulin in Subjects With Diabetes.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Amparo de la PeñaEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. de_la_pena_amparo@lilly.com
Matthew Riddle
Linda A Morrow
Honghua H Jiang
Helle Linnebjerg
Adam Scott
Khin M Win
Marcus Hompesch
Kenneth F Mace
Jennie G Jacobson
Jeffrey A Jackson
Eli Lilly (United States) · USPrecision Research Institute · USOregon Health & Science University · USProfil Institute for Clinical Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHuman regular U-500 (U-500R) insulin (500 units/mL) is increasingly being used clinically, yet its pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) have not been well studied. Therefore, we compared PK and PD of clinically relevant doses of U-500R with the same doses of human regular U-100 (U-100R) insulin (100 units/mL). RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsThis was a single-site, randomized, double-blind, crossover euglycemic clamp study. Single subcutaneous injections of 50- and 100-unit doses of U-500R and U-100R were administered to 24 healthy obese subjects.

resultsBoth overall insulin exposure (area under the serum insulin concentration versus time curve from zero to return to baseline [AUC(0-)(t)(')]) and overall effect (total glucose infused during a clamp) were similar between formulations at both 50- and 100-unit doses (90% [CI] of ratios contained within [0.80, 1.25]). However, peak concentration and effect were significantly lower for U-500R at both doses (P < 0.05). Both formulations produced relatively long durations of action (18.3 to 21.5 h). Time-to-peak concentration and time to maximum effect were significantly longer for U-500R than U-100R at the 100-unit dose (P < 0.05). Time variables reflective of duration of action (late tR(max50), tR(last)) were prolonged for U-500R versus U-100R at both doses (P < 0.05).

conclusionsOverall exposure to and action of U-500R insulin after subcutaneous injection were no different from those of U-100R insulin. For U-500R, peaks of concentration and action profiles were blunted and the effect after the peak was prolonged. These findings may help guide therapy with U-500R insulin for highly insulin-resistant patients with diabetes.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArea Under CurveBlood GlucoseCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGlucose Clamp TechniqueHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin, Regular, HumanMaleMiddle AgedObesityBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin, Regular, Human

Identifiers

PMID21994429
PMCPMC3220843
OpenAlexW2079259745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.