Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21993648›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2012

Techniques to measure pilus retraction forces.

Nicolas Biais, Dustin Higashi, Magdalene So, Benoit Ladoux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Quantifying forces in cell biology.Nature cell biology · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicolas BiaisDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. nicolas.biais@gmail.com
Dustin Higashi
Magdalene So
Benoit Ladoux

Funding

Role of Neisseria Gcp in Tfp dynamics and invasionR01AI079030 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI SO, MAGDALENE Y · 2008 to 2012
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS AI079030NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI079030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of physical forces in biology is becoming more appreciated. Neisseria gonorrhoeaehas become a paradigm for the study of physical forces in the bacterial world. Cycles of elongations and retractions of Type IV pili enables N. gonorrhoeaebacteria to exert forces on its environment, forces that play major roles in the life cycle of this pathogen. In order to better understand the role of these forces, there is a need to fully characterize them. Here, we present two different techniques, optical tweezers and Polyacrylamide MicroPillars (PoMPs), for measuring pilus retraction forces. Initially designed for N. gonorrhoeae, these assays can be readily modified to study other pilus-bearing bacteria including Neisseria meningitidis.

Indexed as

Optical TweezersAcrylic ResinsBiomechanical PhenomenaFimbriae, BacterialMovementNeisseriaPolyacrylamidesAcrylic ResinsPolyacrylamides

Identifiers

PMID21993648
PMCPMC5160128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.