Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21993623›Full record

ArticleNature2011

Perception of sniff phase in mouse olfaction.

Matthew Smear, Roman Shusterman, Rodney O'Connor, Thomas Bozza, Dmitry Rinberg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 153 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
153citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

153 citing papers in PubMed, 253 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A nose-to-brain circuit underlies anxiety regulation by nasal afferent frequency in mice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

93 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew SmearJanelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia 20147, USA.
Roman Shusterman
Rodney O'Connor
Thomas Bozza
Dmitry Rinberg
Janelia Research Campus · USNorthwestern University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Genetic Analysis of Glomerular Map FormationR01DC009640 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI BOZZA, THOMAS · 2010 to 2014
$1.8M
Optogenetic Analysis of Olfactory CircuitsR21DC010911 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI BOZZA, THOMAS · 2010 to 2011
$413k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIDCD NIH HHS R01DC009640NIDCD NIH HHS R21DC010911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Olfactory systems encode odours by which neurons respond and by when they respond. In mammals, every sniff evokes a precise, odour-specific sequence of activity across olfactory neurons. Likewise, in a variety of neural systems, ranging from sensory periphery to cognitive centres, neuronal activity is timed relative to sampling behaviour and/or internally generated oscillations. As in these neural systems, relative timing of activity may represent information in the olfactory system. However, there is no evidence that mammalian olfactory systems read such cues. To test whether mice perceive the timing of olfactory activation relative to the sniff cycle ('sniff phase'), we used optogenetics in gene-targeted mice to generate spatially constant, temporally controllable olfactory input. Here we show that mice can behaviourally report the sniff phase of optogenetically driven activation of olfactory sensory neurons. Furthermore, mice can discriminate between light-evoked inputs that are shifted in the sniff cycle by as little as 10 milliseconds, which is similar to the temporal precision of olfactory bulb odour responses. Electrophysiological recordings in the olfactory bulb of awake mice show that individual cells encode the timing of photoactivation in relation to the sniff in both the timing and the amplitude of their responses. Our work provides evidence that the mammalian olfactory system can read temporal patterns, and suggests that timing of activity relative to sampling behaviour is a potent cue that may enable accurate olfactory percepts to form quickly.

Indexed as

AnimalsCuesElectrophysiologyMaleMiceModels, NeurologicalOdorantsOlfactory BulbOlfactory Receptor NeuronsPhotic StimulationPhysical StimulationSmellTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID21993623
OpenAlexW2022794140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.