Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21993622›Full record

ArticleNature2011

Cascades of multisite phosphorylation control Sic1 destruction at the onset of S phase.

Mardo Kõivomägi, Ervin Valk, Rainis Venta, Anna Iofik, Martin Lepiku, Eva Rose M Balog, Seth M Rubin, David O Morgan, Mart Loog

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 142 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
142citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

142 citing papers in PubMed, 211 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Chromatin association promotes UBR5-mediated degradation of Rb.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Decoding Cdk1 control: from mitotic thresholds to meiotic specificity.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. TOR Complex 1: Orchestrating Nutrient Signaling and Cell Cycle Progression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Cyclin-dependent kinases: Masters of the eukaryotic universe.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Network regulation meets substrate modification chemistry.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

82 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mardo KõivomägiInstitute of Technology, University of Tartu, Tartu 50411, Estonia.
Ervin Valk
Rainis Venta
Anna Iofik
Martin Lepiku
Eva Rose M Balog
Seth M Rubin
David O Morgan
Mart Loog
University of Tartu · EEUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Cell Cycle Control by Cyclin-Dependent KinasesR01GM069901 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MORGAN, DAVID OWEN · 2004 to 2015
$3.6M
Howard Hughes Medical Institute 1253NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069901Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 079014/Z/06/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multisite phosphorylation of proteins has been proposed to transform a graded protein kinase signal into an ultrasensitive switch-like response. Although many multiphosphorylated targets have been identified, the dynamics and sequence of individual phosphorylation events within the multisite phosphorylation process have never been thoroughly studied. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the initiation of S phase is thought to be governed by complexes of Cdk1 and Cln cyclins that phosphorylate six or more sites on the Clb5-Cdk1 inhibitor Sic1, directing it to SCF-mediated destruction. The resulting Sic1-free Clb5-Cdk1 complex triggers S phase. Here, we demonstrate that Sic1 destruction depends on a more complex process in which both Cln2-Cdk1 and Clb5-Cdk1 act in processive multiphosphorylation cascades leading to the phosphorylation of a small number of specific phosphodegrons. The routes of these phosphorylation cascades are shaped by precisely oriented docking interactions mediated by cyclin-specific docking motifs in Sic1 and by Cks1, the phospho-adaptor subunit of Cdk1. Our results indicate that Clb5-Cdk1-dependent phosphorylation generates positive feedback that is required for switch-like Sic1 destruction. Our evidence for a docking network within clusters of phosphorylation sites uncovers a new level of complexity in Cdk1-dependent regulation of cell cycle transitions, and has general implications for the regulation of cellular processes by multisite phosphorylation.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingBinding SitesCDC2 Protein KinaseCell Cycle ProteinsCyclin BCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor ProteinsCyclinsPhosphorylationProteolysisSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsS PhaseAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCDC2 Protein KinaseCell Cycle ProteinsCKS1 protein, S cerevisiaeCLB5 protein, S cerevisiaeCLN2 protein, S cerevisiaeCyclin BCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor ProteinsCyclinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSIC1 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID21993622
PMCPMC3228899
OpenAlexW2083474696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.