Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21992655›Full record

Trial reportBMC gastroenterology2011

Acceptability, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of internet-based exposure treatment for irritable bowel syndrome in a clinical sample: a randomized controlled trial.

Brjánn Ljótsson, Gerhard Andersson, Erik Andersson, Erik Hedman, Perjohan Lindfors, Sergej Andréewitch, Christian Rück, Nils Lindefors

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC gastroenterology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00844961 (Study of the Effectiveness of Internet Delivered Cognitive Behavior Therapy in a Sample of Consecutively Recruited Patients Diagnosed With Irritable Bowel Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00844961 nacompletednot on this map

Study of the Effectiveness of Internet Delivered Cognitive Behavior Therapy in a Sample of Consecutively Recruited Patients Diagnosed With Irritable Bowel Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2008 to 2011Enrolled61ConditionsIrritable Bowel SyndromeArmsInternet delivered cognitive behavior therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Brjánn LjótssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. brjann.ljotsson@ki.se
Gerhard Andersson
Erik Andersson
Erik Hedman
Perjohan Lindfors
Sergej Andréewitch
Christian Rück
Nils Lindefors

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternet-based cognitive behavior therapy (ICBT) has shown promising effects in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). However, to date no study has used a design where participants have been sampled solely from a clinical population. We aimed to investigate the acceptability, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of ICBT for IBS using a consecutively recruited sample from a gastroenterological clinic.

methodsSixty-one patients were randomized to 10 weeks of ICBT (n = 30) or a waiting list control (n = 31). The ICBT was guided by an online therapist and emphasized acceptance of symptoms through exposure and mindfulness training. Severity of IBS symptoms was measured with the Gastrointestinal symptom rating scale--IBS version (GSRS-IBS). Patients in both groups were assessed at pre- and post-treatment while only the ICBT group was assessed 12 months after treatment completion. Health economic data were also gathered at all assessment points and analyzed using bootstrap sampling.

resultsFifty of 61 patients (82%) completed the post-treatment assessment and 20 of 30 patients (67%) in the ICBT group were assessed at 12-month follow-up. The ICBT group demonstrated significantly (p < .001) larger improvements on the IBS-related outcome scales than the waiting list group. The between group effect size on GSRS-IBS was Cohen's d = 0.77 (95% CI: 0.19-1.34). Similar effects were noted on measures of quality of life and IBS-related fear and avoidance behaviors. Improvements in the ICBT group were maintained at 12-month follow-up. The ICBT condition was found to be more cost-effective than the waiting list, with an 87% chance of leading to reduced societal costs combined with clinical effectiveness. The cost-effectiveness was sustained over the 12-month period.

conclusionsICBT proved to be a cost-effective treatment when delivered to a sample recruited from a gastroenterological clinic. However, many of the included patients dropped out of the study and the overall treatment effects were smaller than previous studies with referred and self-referred samples. ICBT may therefore be acceptable and effective for only a subset of clinical patients. Study dropout seemed to be associated with severe symptoms and large impairment. Objective and empirically validated criteria to select which patients to offer ICBT should be developed.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00844961.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyInternetAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisFeedback, PsychologicalFemaleHumansIrritable Bowel SyndromeMalePatient DropoutsQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID21992655
PMCPMC3206465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.