Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21992456›Full record

ArticleInfectious agents and cancer2011

Review of prostate cancer research in Nigeria.

Titilola O Akinremi, Chidiebere N Ogo, Ayodeji O Olutunde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious agents and cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Awareness and Attitudes of Nigerian Men Living in Abuja on Prostate Cancer and Screening.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Titilola O AkinremiDepartment of Pathology, Federal Medical Centre, Abeokuta, Nigeria. bakinremi2@aol.com.
Chidiebere N Ogo
Ayodeji O Olutunde

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledProstate cancer (CaP) disparities in the black man calls for concerted research efforts. This review explores the trend and focus of CaP research activities in Nigeria, one of the ancestral nations for black men. It seeks to locate the place of the Nigerian research environment in the global progress on CaP disparities. Literature was reviewed mainly through a Pubmed search with the terms "prostate cancer"and "Nigeria", as well as from internet and hard copies of journal pages.

findingsOne of the earliest publications about CaP in Nigeria was in 1973 from the nation's 1st tertiary hospital in Ibadan, reporting low incidence, followed by a lull of nearly one decade. In 1980, the incidence rate of CaP was reported as almost similar for black men in Ibadan and Washington and from then on, research work from surgeons and pathologists, from the south to the north, east to west, continued to report increasing prevalence of CaP. Apart from epidemiology, other areas of research include KAP (knowledge attitude and practice) studies (poor education of caregivers and population), histopathology (mostly adenocarcinoma), diagnosis (digital rectal examination [DRE], prostate specific antigen [PSA], ultrasound), clinical features (late presentation and high mortality), and prevention (lifestyle, education and screening). As of today there is a gaping dearth of molecular and genetic studies.

conclusionThe global focus on CaP disparities in black men calls for more efforts from Africa, in all areas of research, along with international collaborations for capacity building.

Identifiers

PMID21992456
PMCPMC3194187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.