Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21992116›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2011

Gene expression profiling in acute allograft rejection: challenging the immunologic constant of rejection hypothesis.

Tara L Spivey, Lorenzo Uccellini, Maria Libera Ascierto, Gabriele Zoppoli, Valeria De Giorgi, Lucia Gemma Delogu, Alyson M Engle, Jaime M Thomas, Ena Wang, Francesco M Marincola and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. T Cells With ActivatedFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  14. Comprehensive Analysis of Cardiac Xeno-Graft Unveils Rejection Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Tara L SpiveyInfectious Disease and Immunogenetics Section (IDIS), Department of Transfusion Medicine, Clinical Center and trans-NIH Center for Human Immunology (CHI), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Lorenzo Uccellini
Maria Libera Ascierto
Gabriele Zoppoli
Valeria De Giorgi
Lucia Gemma Delogu
Alyson M Engle
Jaime M Thomas
Ena Wang
Francesco M Marincola
Davide Bedognetti
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center · USNational Cancer Institute · USNational Cancer Research Institute · GBUniversity of Sassari · IT

Funding

Immunogenetic Study of Infectious Diseases and CancerZIACL002118 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI MARINCOLA, FRANCESCO M · 2009 to 2012
$0k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In humans, the role and relationship between molecular pathways that lead to tissue destruction during acute allograft rejection are not fully understood. Based on studies conducted in humans, we recently hypothesized that different immune-mediated tissue destruction processes (i.e. cancer, infection, autoimmunity) share common convergent final mechanisms. We called this phenomenon the "Immunologic Constant of Rejection (ICR)." The elements of the ICR include molecular pathways that are consistently described through different immune-mediated tissue destruction processes and demonstrate the activation of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs), the recruitment of cytotoxic immune cells (primarily through CXCR3/CCR5 ligand pathways), and the activation of immune effector function genes (IEF genes; granzymes A/B, perforin, etc.). Here, we challenge the ICR hypothesis by using a meta-analytical approach and systematically reviewing microarray studies evaluating gene expression on tissue biopsies during acute allograft rejection. We found the pillars of the ICR consistently present among the studies reviewed, despite implicit heterogeneity. Additionally, we provide a descriptive mechanistic overview of acute allograft rejection by describing those molecular pathways most frequently encountered and thereby thought to be most significant. The biological role of the following molecular pathways is described: IFN-γ, CXCR3/CCR5 ligand, IEF genes, TNF-α, IL-10, IRF-1/STAT-1, and complement pathways. The role of NK cell, B cell and T-regulatory cell signatures are also addressed.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingModels, ImmunologicalGraft RejectionHumansOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisSignal TransductionTransplantation, Homologous

Identifiers

PMID21992116
PMCPMC3213224
OpenAlexW2137474865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.