Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21992086›Full record

GuidelineActa orthopaedica2011

Dutch guideline on total hip prosthesis.

Bart A Swierstra, Anton M J S Vervest, Geert H I M Walenkamp, B Wim Schreurs, Pieter T J Spierings, Ide C Heyligers, Job L C van Susante, Harmen B Ettema, Mariette J Jansen, Pim J Hennis and 3 more

Abstract readReviewPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Acta orthopaedica, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Process of Posthospital Care Involving Telemedicine Solutions for Patients after Total Hip Arthroplasty.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Radiostereometry and new prostheses.Acta orthopaedica · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Bart A SwierstraThe Dutch Orthopaedic Association, The Netherlands. b.swierstra@maartenskliniek.nl
Anton M J S Vervest
Geert H I M Walenkamp
B Wim Schreurs
Pieter T J Spierings
Ide C Heyligers
Job L C van Susante
Harmen B Ettema
Mariette J Jansen
Pim J Hennis
Janneke de Vries
Sabrina B Muller-Ploeger
Margreet A Pols

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipEvidence-Based MedicineAge FactorsContraindicationsFollow-Up StudiesHip ProsthesisHumansNetherlandsProsthesis DesignProsthesis-Related InfectionsReoperationRisk FactorsSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID21992086
PMCPMC3242953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.