ArticleProteins2012
A novel method for protein-protein interaction site prediction using phylogenetic substitution models.
Article in Proteins, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- LZerD webserver for pairwise and multiple protein-protein docking.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- A Deep Learning and XGBoost-Based Method for Predicting Protein-Protein Interaction Sites.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- LZerD Protein-Protein Docking Webserver Enhanced WithFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Review
- Computational structure modeling for diverse categories of macromolecular interactions.Current opinion in structural biology · 2020Review
- A Two-Layer SVM Ensemble-Classifier to Predict Interface Residue Pairs of Protein Trimers.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Modeling disordered protein interactions from biophysical principles.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- Human and server docking prediction for CAPRI round 30-35 using LZerD with combined scoring functions.Proteins · 2017Article
- Cryo-EM Data Are Superior to Contact and Interface Information in Integrative Modeling.Biophysical journal · 2016Article
- Algorithmic approaches to protein-protein interaction site prediction.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2015Article
- Characterizing informative sequence descriptors and predicting binding affinities of heterodimeric protein complexes.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Scoring docking conformations using predicted protein interfaces.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- Highly precise protein-protein interaction prediction based on consensus between template-based and de novo docking methods.BMC proceedings · 2013Article
- Article
- PIBiophysical reviews · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein-protein binding events mediate many critical biological functions in the cell. Typically, functionally important sites in proteins can be well identified by considering sequence conservation. However, protein-protein interaction sites exhibit higher sequence variation than other functional regions, such as catalytic sites of enzymes. Consequently, the mutational behavior leading to weak sequence conservation poses significant challenges to the protein-protein interaction site prediction. Here, we present a phylogenetic framework to capture critical sequence variations that favor the selection of residues essential for protein-protein binding. Through the comprehensive analysis of diverse protein families, we show that protein binding interfaces exhibit distinct amino acid substitution as compared with other surface residues. On the basis of this analysis, we have developed a novel method, BindML, which utilizes the substitution models to predict protein-protein binding sites of protein with unknown interacting partners. BindML estimates the likelihood that a phylogenetic tree of a local surface region in a query protein structure follows the substitution patterns of protein binding interface and nonbinding surfaces. BindML is shown to perform well compared to alternative methods for protein binding interface prediction. The methodology developed in this study is very versatile in the sense that it can be generally applied for predicting other types of functional sites, such as DNA, RNA, and membrane binding sites in proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.