ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology
Evaluation of NHANES biomonitoring data for volatile organic chemicals in blood: application of chemical-specific screening criteria.
Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genotoxic exposures to volatile organic compounds in golden retrievers with and without multicentric lymphoma.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Blood volatile organic compounds associated with non-reversible and reversible airflow obstruction in US adults.The European respiratory journal · 2022Article
- Metabolomics and the Multi-Omics View of Cancer.Metabolites · 2022Review
- Volatile Organic Compounds in Blood as Biomarkers of Exposure to JP-8 Jet Fuel Among US Air Force Personnel.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2016Article
- Evaluation of biomonitoring data from the CDC National Exposure Report in a risk assessment context: perspectives across chemicals.Environmental health perspectives · 2013Article
- The use of biomonitoring data in exposure and human health risk assessment: benzene case study.Critical reviews in toxicology · 2013Review
- Application of physiologically based pharmacokinetic models in chemical risk assessment.Journal of toxicology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Available biomonitoring data for volatile organic chemicals (VOCs) in blood from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (2003-2004) (CDC, 2009) were compared with recently derived screening biomonitoring equivalent (BE) values (Aylward et al., 2010). A BE is defined as the estimated concentration or range of concentrations of a chemical or its metabolites in a biological medium (blood, urine, or other medium) that is consistent with an existing health-based exposure guidance value. Blood concentrations of VOCs from the NHANES data set were compared with predicted screening BE values based upon a hazard quotient (HQ) for individual chemicals, and a hazard index (HI) approach for combined exposures. HI values for detected chemicals were generally at or below a value of 1, suggesting that the potential for deleterious effects is low. However, smoking was an important determinant of HI and HQ values. Detected levels of benzene in non-smokers were within the range of BE values corresponding to a 1 × 10(-6)-1 × 10(-4) range for upper-bound cancer risk; in smokers, levels of benzene were at the upper end of or exceeded this range. For VOCs that were not detected in the NHANES sampling, analytical detection limits were generally sufficiently sensitive to detect concentrations consistent with existing non-cancer and cancer risk-based exposure guidance values. Interpretations of measured blood concentrations of VOCs must be made with caution due to the substantial within-individual, within-day fluctuations in levels expected due to the rapid elimination of VOCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21989501What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.