Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21989111›Full record

ArticleExperimental eye research2011

Enhanced retinal pigment epithelium regeneration after injury in MRL/MpJ mice.

Huiming Xia, Mark P Krebs, Shalesh Kaushal, Edward W Scott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental eye research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The immune response is a critical regulator of zebrafish retinal pigment epithelium regeneration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Morphologic and histopathologic change of sodium iodate-induced retinal degeneration in adult rats.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Huiming XiaProgram in Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Florida, 1600 Southwest Archer Road, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Mark P Krebs
Shalesh Kaushal
Edward W Scott
University of Florida · US

Funding

Vision Research CoreP30EY021721 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI HAUSWIRTH, WILLIAM W · 2011 to 2015
$2.8M
Hematopoietic Stem Cells Regenerate RPER01EY018158 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SCOTT, EDWARD W · 2007 to 2011
$1.6M
NEI NIH HHS EY018158NEI NIH HHS P30 EY021721NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regenerative medicine holds the promise of restoring cells and tissues that are destroyed in human disease, including degenerative eye disorders. However, development of this approach in the eye has been limited by a lack of animal models that show robust regeneration of ocular tissue. Here, we test whether MRL/MpJ mice, which exhibit enhanced wound healing, can efficiently regenerate the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) after an injury that mimics the loss of this tissue in age-related macular degeneration. The RPE of MRL/MpJ and control AKR/J mice was injured by retro-orbital injection of sodium iodate at 20 mg/kg body weight, which titration studies indicated was optimal for highlighting strain differences in the response to injury. Five days after sodium iodate injection at this dose, electroretinography of both strains revealed equivalent retinal responses that were significantly reduced compared to untreated mice. At one and two months post-injection, retinal responses were restored in MRL/MpJ but not AKR/J mice. Bright field and fluorescence microscopy of eyecup cryosections indicated an initial central loss of RPE cells and RPE65 immunostaining in MRL/MpJ and AKR/J mice, with preservation of peripheral RPE. Phalloidin staining of posterior eye whole mounts confirmed this pattern of RPE loss, and revealed a transition region characterized by RPE cell shedding and restructuring in both strains, suggesting a similar initial response to injury. At one month post-injection, central RPE cells, RPE65 immunostaining and phalloidin staining were restored in MRL/MpJ but not AKR/J mice. BrdU incorporation was observed throughout the RPE of MRL/MpJ but not AKR/J mice after one month of administration following sodium iodate treatment, consistent with RPE proliferation. These findings provide evidence for a dramatic regeneration of the RPE after injury in MRL/MpJ mice that supports full recovery of retinal function, which has not been observed previously in mammalian eyes. This model should prove useful for understanding molecular mechanisms that underlie regeneration, and for identifying factors that promote RPE regeneration in age-related macular degeneration and related diseases.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationRegenerationAnimalsCarrier ProteinsCell Shapecis-trans-IsomerasesDisease Models, AnimalElectroretinographyEvoked Potentials, VisualEye ProteinsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsImmunohistochemistryIodatesMacular DegenerationMiceMice, Inbred AKRCarrier Proteinscis-trans-Isomerasesenhanced green fluorescent proteinEye ProteinsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsIodatesRetinoid Isomerohydrolasesodium iodate

Identifiers

PMID21989111
PMCPMC3249660
OpenAlexW1985226327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.