Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21988720›Full record

ArticleTissue antigens2011

A community standard for immunogenomic data reporting and analysis: proposal for a STrengthening the REporting of Immunogenomic Studies statement.

J A Hollenbach, S J Mack, P-A Gourraud, R M Single, M Maiers, D Middleton, G Thomson, S G E Marsh, M D Varney, Immunogenomics Data Analysis Working Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue antigens, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. HLA-DQB1*02 and DQB1*06:03P are associated with peanut allergy.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

J A HollenbachCenter for Genetics, Children's Hospital & Research Center Oakland, Oakland, CA, USA. idawg@immunogenomics.org
S J Mack
P-A Gourraud
R M Single
M Maiers
D Middleton
G Thomson
S G E Marsh
M D Varney
Immunogenomics Data Analysis Working Group

Funding

The Role of HLA and KIR in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Crohn's DiseaseU01AI067068 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ERLICH, HENRY A, TRACHTENBERG, ELIZABETH A · 2005 to 2014
$10.9M
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Ulcerative Colitis StudyU19AI067152 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI VYSE, TIMOTHY JAMES · 2005 to 2009
$10.1M
NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI040076NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI067068NIAID NIH HHS U01AI067068NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI067152NIAID NIH HHS U19AI067152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern high-throughput HLA and KIR typing technologies are generating a wealth of immunogenomic data with the potential to revolutionize the fields of histocompatibility and immune-related disease association and population genetic research, much as SNP-based approaches have revolutionized association research. The STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association studies (STREGA) statement provides community-based data reporting and analysis standards for genomic disease-association studies, identifying specific areas in which adoption of reporting guidelines can improve the consistent interpretation of genetic studies. While aspects of STREGA can be applied to immunogenomic studies, HLA and KIR research requires additional consideration, as the high levels of polymorphism associated with immunogenomic data pose unique methodological and computational challenges to the synthesis of information across datasets. Here, we outline the principle challenges to consistency in immunogenomic studies, and propose that an immunogenomic-specific analog to the STREGA statement, a STrengthening the REporting of Immunogenomic Studies (STREIS) statement, be developed as part of the 16th International HLA and Immunogenetics Workshop. We propose that STREIS extends at least four of the 22 elements of the STREGA statement to specifically address issues pertinent to immunogenomic data: HLA and KIR nomenclature, data-validation, ambiguity resolution, and the analysis of highly polymorphic genetic systems. As with the STREGA guidelines, the intent behind STREIS is not to dictate the design of immunogenomic studies, but to ensure consistent and transparent reporting of research, facilitating the synthesis of HLA and KIR data across studies.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsHLA AntigensHumansResearch DesignHLA Antigens

Identifiers

PMID21988720
PMCPMC3636772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.