Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21988468›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2012

Ceftazidime dosage regimen in intensive care unit patients: from a population pharmacokinetic approach to clinical practice via Monte Carlo simulations.

Bernard Georges, Jean-Marie Conil, Stéphanie Ruiz, Thierry Seguin, Pierre Cougot, Olivier Fourcade, Georges Houin, Sylvie Saivin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Bernard GeorgesPôle d'Anesthésie Réanimation, CHU Rangueil, TSA 50032, Toulouse, France.
Jean-Marie Conil
Stéphanie Ruiz
Thierry Seguin
Pierre Cougot
Olivier Fourcade
Georges Houin
Sylvie Saivin
Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRHôpital Rangueil · FRImation (United States) · USInstitut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale · FRToulouse Mathematics Institute · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

what is already known about this subjectThe large variability in drug pharmacokinetic disposition has already been described in ICU patients leading to important variations in drugs concentrations. The usual recommended dosage of ceftazidime is not adapted for all ICU situations and ceftazidime should be monitored closely. New recommendations have to be given for some specific cases. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: Our results propose individual therapeutic drug monitoring taking into account: For the patient: the reason of admission in the ICU, the mechanical ventilation status and the creatinine clearance calculated by the modified diet in renal disease (MDRD). • For the antibiotics: the lung distribution, the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the strain to eradicate and the potential toxicity. AIM To predict the ceftazidime dosage regimen as a function of the glomerular filtration rate expressed by the modification of the diet in renal disease (MDRD), reason for admission and mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit (ICU) patients to treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia.

methodA published and qualified population pharmacokinetic model was used to perform Monte Carlo simulations of ceftazidime concentrations. The serum target of 40-100 mg l(-1) was defined based on the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), the European break point (EBP), the pulmonary drug diffusion and toxicity. The recommended dosage regimens were based on the maximum percentile of the patients with simulated steady state concentrations reaching the target.

resultsSteady-state was reached at 72 h whatever the MDRD. The simulations of serum concentrations generated higher percentiles of the population reaching the target after continuous administration. We recommend a 4 g continuous dose after the usual 2 g loading dose for patients with MDRD from 10 to 30 ml min(-1) , 6 g for MDRD between 40 and 80 ml min(-1) , 8 g for MDRD from 90 to 110 ml min(-1) , 10 g for MDRD from 120 to 190 ml min(-1) and 12 g day(-1) for patients with MDRD higher than 200 ml min(-1) .

conclusionOur study demonstrated that in ICU patients for a given MDRD, steady-state takes longer to reach in polytrauma patients than in patients with medical or post surgery reasons for admission. Continuous infusion ensures that a higher percentage of patients reaches the target than the same dose given by discontinuous administration and this only depends on MDRD.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, BiologicalAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftazidimeCritical CareDose-Response Relationship, DrugGlomerular Filtration RateHumansIntensive Care UnitsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMonte Carlo MethodPneumonia, BacterialPseudomonas InfectionsRespiration, ArtificialAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftazidime

Identifiers

PMID21988468
PMCPMC3376435
OpenAlexW1484775577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.