ArticleJournal of endourology2012
Stability of the infection marker struvite in urinary stone samples.
Article in Journal of endourology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeStruvite in kidney stones is an important marker for infection. In kidney stone samples, struvite is known to be prone to chemical breakdown, but no data exist on the stability of samples stored in dry form. The objective of this study was to examine stability of struvite under increasingly poor conditions of storage. MATERIALS AND
methodsSamples of struvite kidney stones were broken to obtain 38 pieces averaging 67 mg in weight, and these were randomized into four storage conditions: Airtight containers stored in the dark, open containers in the dark, open containers in ambient light, and open containers at elevated temperature (40°C). Pieces were left for 6 months, and then analyzed for changes using micro CT and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR).
resultsInitial samples proved to be struvite, indicating no transformation in the large specimens that had been stored in airtight containers in the dark for more than 6 years before this study. Pieces of struvite taken from these large specimens appeared unchanged by micro CT and FT-IR after being stored in closed containers for 6 months, but 8 of 9 pieces in open containers showed the presence of newberyite in surface layers, as did 10 of 10 pieces in open containers out in ambient light. All pieces stored at 40°C showed transformation of struvite, with 60% of the pieces showing the presence of amorphous phosphates, indicating complete breakdown of struvite in the surface layers of the pieces.
conclusionWe conclude that struvite in dry kidney stone samples is stable when the specimens are stored in airtight containers at room temperature, even after several years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.