Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21988096›Full record

Trial reportHealth psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association2012

One-year outcomes of a drug abuse prevention program for older teens and emerging adults: evaluating a motivational interviewing booster component.

Steve Sussman, Ping Sun, Louise A Rohrbach, Donna Spruijt-Metz

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Universal school-based prevention for illicit drug use.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Prevention education effects on fundamental memory processes.Evaluation & the health professions · 2012
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steve SussmanDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90033-9045, USA. ssussma@usc.edu
Ping Sun
Louise A Rohrbach
Donna Spruijt-Metz
University of Southern California · US

Funding

Drug Abuse Prevention for High Risk Emerging AdultsR01DA020138 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI SUSSMAN, STEVEN Y · 2007 to 2011
$3.5M
NIDA NIH HHS DA020138NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA020138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe present study tested the efficacy of motivational interviewing-based booster sessions for Project Toward No Drug Abuse (TND), a 12-session school-based curriculum targeting youth at risk for drug abuse. In addition, generalization of effects to risky sexual behavior was assessed. The 1-year outcomes evaluation of the project is presented.

methodA total of 24 schools were randomized to one of three conditions: standard care control (SCC), TND classroom program only (TND-only), and TND plus motivational interviewing booster (TND + MI). A total of 1186 participants completed baseline and 1-year follow-up surveys. Following the classroom program, youth in the TND + MI condition received up to 3 sessions of MI in person or by telephone. Effects were examined on 30-day cigarette, alcohol, marijuana, and hard drug use, as well as measures of risky sexual behavior (number of sex partners, condom use, having sex while using drugs or alcohol).

resultsCollapsed across the 2 program conditions, results showed significant reductions in alcohol use, hard drug use, and cigarette smoking relative to controls. These effects held for an overall substance use index. The MI booster component failed to achieve significant incremental effects above and beyond the TND classroom program. No effects were found on risky sexual behavior.

conclusionsWhile the program effects of previous studies were replicated, the study failed to demonstrate that an adequately implemented MI booster was of incremental value at 1-year follow-up.

Indexed as

Interviews as TopicMotivationRisk-TakingAdolescentAlcohol DrinkingBehavior TherapyCounselingCurriculumData CollectionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth BehaviorHumansMaleProgram EvaluationSchools

Identifiers

PMID21988096
PMCPMC3276711
OpenAlexW2037906735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.