Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21987728›Full record

ArticleChemical senses2012

A conditioned aversion study of sucrose and SC45647 taste in TRPM5 knockout mice.

Meghan C Eddy, Benjamin K Eschle, Darlene Peterson, Nathan Lauras, Robert F Margolskee, Eugene R Delay

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical senses, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Sweet Taste Signaling: The Core Pathways and Regulatory Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. TRPM4 and TRPM5 are both required for normal signaling in taste receptor cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meghan C EddyDepartment of Biology, University of Vermont, Marsh Life Science Building, Room 113, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
Benjamin K Eschle
Darlene Peterson
Nathan Lauras
Robert F Margolskee
Eugene R Delay
University of Vermont · USMonell Chemical Senses Center · US

Funding

The Role of T1r Taste Receptors in GustationR01DC003155 · NIDCD · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI MARGOLSKEE, ROBERT F. · 1998 to 2014
$5.2M
GUSTDUCIN PHOSPHODIESTERASE INTERACTION IN GUSTATIONR01DC003055 · NIDCD · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI MARGOLSKEE, ROBERT F. · 1996 to 2013
$4.6M
Role of taste signaling elements in enteroendocrine cellsR01DK081421 · NIDDK · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI MARGOLSKEE, ROBERT F. · 2010 to 2013
$1.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003055NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003155NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK081421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previously, published studies have reported mixed results regarding the role of the TRPM5 cation channel in signaling sweet taste by taste sensory cells. Some studies have reported a complete loss of sweet taste preference in TRPM5 knockout (KO) mice, whereas others have reported only a partial loss of sweet taste preference. This study reports the results of conditioned aversion studies designed to motivate wild-type (WT) and KO mice to respond to sweet substances. In conditioned taste aversion experiments, WT mice showed nearly complete LiCl-induced response suppression to sucrose and SC45647. In contrast, TRPM5 KO mice showed a much smaller conditioned aversion to either sweet substance, suggesting a compromised, but not absent, ability to detect sweet taste. A subsequent conditioned flavor aversion experiment was conducted to determine if TRPM5 KO mice were impaired in their ability to learn a conditioned aversion. In this experiment, KO and WT mice were conditioned to a mixture of SC45647 and amyl acetate (an odor cue). Although WT mice avoided both components of the stimulus mixture, they avoided SC45647 more than the odor cue. The KO mice also avoided both stimuli, but they avoided the odor component more than SC45647, suggesting that while the KO mice are capable of learning an aversion, to them the odor cue was more salient than the taste cue. Collectively, these findings suggest the TRPM5 KO mice have some residual ability to detect SC45647 and sucrose, and, like bitter, there may be a TRPM5-independent transduction pathway for detecting these substances.

Indexed as

AnimalsChoice BehaviorConditioning, PsychologicalDysgeusiaGuanidinesLithium ChlorideMiceMice, KnockoutOdorantsPentanolsSignal TransductionSmellSucroseSweetening AgentsTasteTaste Perceptionamyl acetateGuanidinesLithium ChloridePentanolsSC 45647SucroseSweetening AgentsTrpm5 protein, mouseTRPM Cation Channels

Identifiers

PMID21987728
PMCPMC3348170
OpenAlexW2169399784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.