ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2011
Natural orifice transluminal endoscopy surgery: A review.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison between single-incision and conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a meta-analysis from eight RCTs.International journal of colorectal disease · 2013Pooled it
- Review
- Minimally invasive gastrointestinal surgery: From past to the future.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021Review
- Transanal NOTES total mesorectal excision (TME) in patients with rectal cancer: Is anatomy better preserved?Techniques in coloproctology · 2016Article
- Initial experience of transanal total mesorectal excision with rigid or flexible transanal platforms in cadavers.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Article
- NOTES total mesorectal excision (TME) for patients with rectal neoplasia: a preliminary experience.Surgical endoscopy · 2014Article
- Can single incision laproscopic cholecystectomy replace the traditional four port laproscopic approach: a review.Global journal of health science · 2014Article
- Simulation in surgical education.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2012Article
- Cholecystectomy: What's new?Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2012Article
- Natural orifice transesophageal endoscopic surgery: state of the art.Minimally invasive surgery · 2012Article
- Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery in humans: a review.Minimally invasive surgery · 2012Article
- Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it a plausible alternative to the traditional four-port laparoscopic approach?Minimally invasive surgery · 2012Article
- Single-incision laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with suprapubic incision.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgery started spreading worldwide in 1987, when the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. Meanwhile, improvement of endoscopic equipment and instruments allowed gastroenterologists to attempt more aggressive endoluminal interventions, even beyond the wall barrier. The first transgastric peritoneoscopy, in 2004, brought to light the concept of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). The idea of incisionless surgery is attractive and has become a new goal for both surgeons and other people interested in this field of investigation. The authors present a review of all developments concerning NOTES, including animal studies and human experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.