Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21987581›Full record

Trial reportArchives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)2012

The steroids for corneal ulcers trial: study design and baseline characteristics.

Muthiah Srinivasan, Jeena Mascarenhas, Revathi Rajaraman, Meenakshi Ravindran, Prajna Lalitha, David V Glidden, Kathryn J Ray, Kevin C Hong, Catherine E Oldenburg, Salena M Lee and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00324168 (Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00324168 phase4completednot on this map

Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThomas M. LietmanRan2006 to 2012Enrolled500ConditionsCorneal Ulcer, Eye Infections, BacterialArmsAntibiotics, Topical corticosteroid, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Topical corticosteroids as adjunctive therapy for bacterial keratitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Muthiah SrinivasanAravind Eye Care System, Madurai, India.
Jeena Mascarenhas
Revathi Rajaraman
Meenakshi Ravindran
Prajna Lalitha
David V Glidden
Kathryn J Ray
Kevin C Hong
Catherine E Oldenburg
Salena M Lee
Michael E Zegans
Stephen D McLeod
Thomas M Lietman
Nisha R Acharya
Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial Group
Aravind Eye Hospital · IN

Funding

Rapid-Prototyping and Design CoreP30EY002162 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ULLIAN, ERIK M · 1985 to 2024
$16.8M
The Steroids for Cornea Ulcers TrialU10EY015114 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LIETMAN, THOMAS M · 2005 to 2009
$2.4M
Predicting and Improving Clinical Outcomes for Bacterial KeratitisK23EY017897 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ACHARYA, NISHA · 2007 to 2011
$1.1M
NEI NIH HHS EY02162NEI NIH HHS K23 EY017897NEI NIH HHS P30 EY002162NEI NIH HHS U10 EY015114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo provide comprehensive trial methods and baseline data for the Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial and to present epidemiological characteristics such as risk factors, causative organisms, and ulcer severity.

methodsBaseline data from a 1:1 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked clinical trial comparing prednisolone phosphate, 1%, with placebo as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of bacterial corneal ulcers. Eligible patients had a culture-positive bacterial corneal ulcer and had been taking moxifloxacin for 48 hours. The primary outcome for the trial is best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 3 months from enrollment. This report provides comprehensive baseline data, including best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, infiltrate size, microbiological results, and patient demographics, for patients enrolled in the trial.

resultsOf 500 patients enrolled, 97% were in India. Two hundred twenty patients (44%) were agricultural workers. Median baseline visual acuity was 0.84 logMAR (Snellen, 20/125) (interquartile range, 0.36-1.7; Snellen, 20/50 to counting fingers). Baseline visual acuity was not significantly different between the United States and India. Ulcers in India had larger infiltrate/scar sizes (P = .04) and deeper infiltrates (P = .04) and were more likely to be localized centrally (P = .002) than ulcers enrolled in the United States. Gram-positive bacteria were the most common organisms isolated from the ulcers (n = 366, 72%).

conclusionsThe Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial will compare the use of a topical corticosteroid with placebo as adjunctive therapy for bacterial corneal ulcers. Patients enrolled in this trial had diverse ulcer severity and on average significantly reduced visual acuity at presentation.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00324168.

Indexed as

Research DesignAdministration, TopicalAdultAnti-Infective AgentsAza CompoundsBacteriaCorneaCorneal UlcerDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationEye Infections, BacterialFemaleFluoroquinolonesGlucocorticoidsHumansMaleAnti-Infective AgentsAza CompoundsFluoroquinolonesGlucocorticoidsMoxifloxacinPrednisoloneprednisolone phosphateQuinolines

Identifiers

PMID21987581
PMCPMC3830555
OpenAlexW2103868267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.